2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ARC 3.0: An expanded Python toolbox for atomic physics calculations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the D states, the discrepancy between experiment and theory is larger, with more scatter in the data, which we attribute partly to the very large sensitivity to electric fields of the F states, to which the D states can couple. For the target state lifetimes, an agreement between the measured and theoretically predicted values ( [49,50], which are based on the standard treatment of BBR, i.e., without cavity effects) is less good, with pronounced regions of shorter lifetimes in all three sets of states, especially at high principal quantum numbers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the D states, the discrepancy between experiment and theory is larger, with more scatter in the data, which we attribute partly to the very large sensitivity to electric fields of the F states, to which the D states can couple. For the target state lifetimes, an agreement between the measured and theoretically predicted values ( [49,50], which are based on the standard treatment of BBR, i.e., without cavity effects) is less good, with pronounced regions of shorter lifetimes in all three sets of states, especially at high principal quantum numbers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Experimental results for state-ensemble and targetstate lifetimes of S, P and D states are shown in Fig. 2, along with numerical simulations based on lifetime calculations using the open-source software package ARC [49,50]. Those lifetimes are extracted by fitting a single exponential decay curve (with offset fixed at 0) to the experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The eigenstates of H 0 are |n, S, L, J, m J , where L and S denote the quantum numbers of the electronic orbital angular momentum and the electronic spin, respectively. We obtain the corresponding eigenenergies E (n,S,L,J,m J ) for the unperturbed atomic Rydberg states of Rb using the ARC (Alkali.ne Rydberg Calculator) package [25]. For the wave functions for the states |n, S, L, J, m J , we use analytical expressions from [26].…”
Section: Energy (Ghzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error Stray interactions between two separate doublets should be negligible based on simulations of interaction energies at the minimum, six lattice site separation between two doublets [74]. However, to investigate if undesired interactions between doublets is nevertheless limiting the Bell state fidelity, we perform Bell state fidelity experiments in a 4×5 doublet array, where the spacing between doublets is increased from six lattice sites to eleven.…”
Section: Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%