2014
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1942-14.2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arc Visualization of Odor Objects Reveals Experience-Dependent Ensemble Sharpening, Separation, and Merging in Anterior Piriform Cortex in Adult Rat

Abstract: Visualization using the immediate early gene Arc revealed sparser and more robust odor representations in the anterior piriform cortex of adult rats when odor was associated with water reward over 2-3 d. Rewarded odor "mixtures" resulted in rats responding to either component odor similarly, and, correspondingly, the odor representations became more similar as indexed by increased overlap in piriform Arc-expressing (Arc ϩ ) pyramidal neurons. The increased overlap was consistent with the rats' generalization f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A two-way mixed ANOVA revealed a significant effect of Day (F6, 66 = 10.713, p < 0.001), but no Group X Day interaction (F6, 66 = 0.755, p = 0.608), or Group effect (F1,11 = 0.527, p = 0.483). This underscores NE's role in discriminations that require pattern separation (5,9). Enhancement of subtle tactile discriminations by tonic 5-Hz LC activation (1) has also been reported in rats, a frequency not explored here.…”
Section: Lc Phasic Patterns Enhance Similar Odor Discrimination Learningsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A two-way mixed ANOVA revealed a significant effect of Day (F6, 66 = 10.713, p < 0.001), but no Group X Day interaction (F6, 66 = 0.755, p = 0.608), or Group effect (F1,11 = 0.527, p = 0.483). This underscores NE's role in discriminations that require pattern separation (5,9). Enhancement of subtle tactile discriminations by tonic 5-Hz LC activation (1) has also been reported in rats, a frequency not explored here.…”
Section: Lc Phasic Patterns Enhance Similar Odor Discrimination Learningsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Previous studies have described learning-related plasticity at multiple levels within the olfactory system (Abraham et al, 2014; Chapuis and Wilson, 2012; Doucette and Restrepo, 2008; Doucette et al, 2011; Kass et al, 2013, 2016; Li et al, 2015; Shakhawat et al, 2014; Wachowiak et al, 2005). Our study contributes to the mounting evidence supporting the olfactory bulb as an important locus for learning- related activity changes (Abraham et al, 2014; Doucette and Restrepo, 2008; Doucette et al, 2011; Li et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modulatory functions are sensitive to brain states, as neural activity in the olfactory bulb during the awake state has been shown to be dramatically different from the anesthetized state (Blauvelt et al, 2013; Kato et al, 2012; Kollo et al, 2014; Rinberg and Gelperin, 2006). Recent studies in awake behaving animals are beginning to shed light on the way olfactory experience and learning alters the dynamics of olfactory circuits (Abraham et al, 2014; Doucette and Restrepo, 2008; Doucette et al, 2011; Li et al, 2015; Shakhawat et al, 2014). However, a comprehensive understanding of how different types of experience affect odor representations in the early stages of processing is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(C1) Odor reward learning increases the stability of the rewarded odor representation. S + refers to positive rewarded odor stimulus (e.g., peppermint); S − refers to negative unrewarded odor stimulus (e.g., vanillin; Shakhawat et al, 2014b ). When a trained rat is exposed to S + , the proportion of neurons recruiting Arc twice is increased.…”
Section: Odor Representations In the Olfactory Bulb And Anterior Pirimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is temporally relocated from the nucleus, where it appears 5 min after recruitment, to cytoplasm where it asymptotes ~25 min later. Thus cells where Arc transcription is recently recruited by odor can be compared to the cells that responded to the same or a different odor at an earlier time point (Shakhawat et al, 2014a , b ).…”
Section: Arc -Indexed Odor Representations and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%