2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeae.2012.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaeological studies of the Kamenny Ambar (Olgino) fortified settlement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This micro-region has been under archaeological focus since 2005 (Hanks and Doonan, 2009; Krause and Korjakova, 2014; Krause and Koryakova, 2013; Krause et al, 2010). Geophysical investigations in several settlements and archaeological excavations at Konoplyanka and Kamennyi Ambar assisted in the reconstruction of outlines and internal structures (Fornasier, 2014; Knoll, 2014; Koryakova et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This micro-region has been under archaeological focus since 2005 (Hanks and Doonan, 2009; Krause and Korjakova, 2014; Krause and Koryakova, 2013; Krause et al, 2010). Geophysical investigations in several settlements and archaeological excavations at Konoplyanka and Kamennyi Ambar assisted in the reconstruction of outlines and internal structures (Fornasier, 2014; Knoll, 2014; Koryakova et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stratigraphic sequence documented by recent excavations at the enclosed settlement of Kamennyj Ambar near the KA-5 cemetery attests to two main phases of occupation. Ceramic fragments of the Sintashta type were recovered from the ditch and lowest levels of the houses investigated to date, while fragments of the more recent Srubnaya-Alakul type ceramics were found in the upper settlement layers (Koryakova et al 2011: 70–71, tab. 1).…”
Section: Chronology Of the Sintashta Materials In The Southern Trans-umentioning
confidence: 99%