1980
DOI: 10.1086/202567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaeology and Development [and Comments and Reply]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some archaeologists have been able to successfully create truly collaborative community-based projects in which both scientific and Indigenous interests are addressed (Greer et al 2002;Marshall 2002;Samuels and Daugherty 1991;Spector 1993). Other archaeologists propose that we use our research to directly confront racism by changing national discourse, challenging embedded notions of cultural or racial inferiority, and modifying school curricula (Miller 1980;Sanchez 2012). These are all important and oftenoverlooked responsibilities and privileges of our discipline.…”
Section: A Brief Summary Of Development Theory In Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some archaeologists have been able to successfully create truly collaborative community-based projects in which both scientific and Indigenous interests are addressed (Greer et al 2002;Marshall 2002;Samuels and Daugherty 1991;Spector 1993). Other archaeologists propose that we use our research to directly confront racism by changing national discourse, challenging embedded notions of cultural or racial inferiority, and modifying school curricula (Miller 1980;Sanchez 2012). These are all important and oftenoverlooked responsibilities and privileges of our discipline.…”
Section: A Brief Summary Of Development Theory In Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are increasingly aware that we are butone of a number of parties (whose numbers 7This is obviously not the first time that archaeologists have.been involved in controversies over the political uses of the past, the "Mound Builders Controversy" (Silverberg 1974) being a noted example. There are many others (see Silberman 1990aSilberman , 1990bFowler 1987;Messenger 1989· McBryde 1985Layton 198~a, 1989b;Miller 1980;and Lewis 1975, among others, for additional examples). and interests change through time) who are concerned with the past.…”
Section: Charged To Live In Harmony With One Anothermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As anthropologists we cannot continue to perpetuate Western paradigms that militate against local historical sensibilities. This is particularly true of the practice of archaeology in the Third World (Miller 1980); it is even more poignantly relevant in Africa because of the colonial history of the West on that continent.…”
Section: Contemporary Issues Reexaminedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical information that survives the initial witnesses to become part of an oral tradition that extends through genera-tions has continuing social and cultural significance to the group that preserves it. It is instructive to observe that one response to Miller's (1980) recent call for research germane to local interests was by members of the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Eduardo Mondlane University, Mozambique. They argued vigorously that a truly African archaeology must incorporate oral traditions into any research program in later prehistory (Morais et al 1980:715-716).…”
Section: Ethnohistory Oral Traditions and Historymentioning
confidence: 99%