1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1040-6182(97)00060-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaeology of the Pleistocene–holocene Transition in Eastern North America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of recent paleontological studies indicate regional differences in the timing of megafaunal extinction, including events that took place in the Holocene (MacPhee et al, 2002;Ficcarelli et al, 2003;Stuart et al, 2004), so it is not surprising to find differences in the climate (Dunbar, in press) and the timing of extinction events between the southeastern and southwestern United States. Unless the Suwannee point toolkit is older than we think, as some have suggested (Stanford, 1991), the preponderance of archaeological evidence indicates that the tool kit (Anderson and Sassaman, 1996;Ellis et al, 1998;Goodyear, 1999) and associated megafaunal remains are Middle Paleoindian (Dunbar et al, in press; Dunbar and Vojnovski, in press). …”
Section: Archaeological Overviewmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A number of recent paleontological studies indicate regional differences in the timing of megafaunal extinction, including events that took place in the Holocene (MacPhee et al, 2002;Ficcarelli et al, 2003;Stuart et al, 2004), so it is not surprising to find differences in the climate (Dunbar, in press) and the timing of extinction events between the southeastern and southwestern United States. Unless the Suwannee point toolkit is older than we think, as some have suggested (Stanford, 1991), the preponderance of archaeological evidence indicates that the tool kit (Anderson and Sassaman, 1996;Ellis et al, 1998;Goodyear, 1999) and associated megafaunal remains are Middle Paleoindian (Dunbar et al, in press; Dunbar and Vojnovski, in press). …”
Section: Archaeological Overviewmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Alternatively, human hunting may have increased the numbers of animals dying or being cached at sites of good bone preservation, such as in small ponds and bogs, where finds of these fossils are typically located (Fisher, 1995). Paleoindians using fluted, lanceolate, projectile points had spread throughout most areas south of the ice sheets by 11 ka BP and possibly by 11.5 ka BP (Ellis et al, 1998;Canadian Archaeological Radiocarbon Database, 2005). Many archaeological sites of this period, few of which are radiocarbon dated, are located on the relict shorelines of the glacial Great Lakes (Jackson, 1983).…”
Section: Ka Bpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no obvious reason for discarding all of them. It was also at about 10 ka BP that aboriginals in eastern and central North America changed the styling of their stone points from fluted projectile points to non-fluted forms that may have been used more commonly as knives, and shortly thereafter to side-and corner-notched projectile points (Ellis et al, 1998). Possibly such changes reflect the changes of available faunal resources pursuant to extinction.…”
Section: Ka Bpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see a disjuncture between Clovis and Dalton: Clovis land-use patterns reflect long-distance settlement relocations covering hundreds of kilometers that likely targeted caribou; conversely, Dalton land-use patterns reflect a more sedentary and likely river-oriented lifestyle focused on deer, fish, waterfowl, and other localized seasonal resources. Although Dalton culture is often classified as Late Paleoindian (e.g., Morse 1997;Ellis et al 1998;Goodyear 1999), evidence of reduced mobility, increased population densities, increased woodworking, and budding social complexity support the argument that Dalton is an initial Archaic florescence, not a Late Paleoindian climax. The Archaic tradition is more than a cultural-historical unit demarcated by point types and radiocarbon dates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%