Archeoguide

Vlahakis, V.; Karigiannis, John; Tsotros, M.; Gounaris, Michael; Almeida, Luís; Stricker, Didier; Gleue, Tim; Christou, Ioannis T.; Carlucci, Renzo; Ioannidis, Nikos

doi:10.1145/584993.585015

Cited by 181 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Seminal work in this field was reported by the Walkthrough project [6], which provided a digital visualisation of a specified location in a virtual building at a frame-rate of one frame every 3-5 s. With faster computers came graphics at interactive frame-rates and subsequently the immersive Cave Automatic Virtual Envirionments (CAVEs), where several users could share a virtual view of complex data [7]. Other augmented reality projects brought similar visualisations to a round table to facilitate cooperative discussions with stake holders [8], or to the outside to present past or future buildings on site [9][10][11].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tango vs. HoloLens: A Comparison of Collaborative Indoor AR Visualisations Using Hand-Held and Hands-Free Devices

Riedlinger

Oppermann

Prinz

2019

MTI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we compare a Google Tango tablet with the Microsoft HoloLens smartglasses in the context of the visualisation and interaction with Building Information Modeling data. A user test was conducted where 16 participants solved four tasks, two for each device, in small teams of two. Two aspects are analysed in the user test: the visualisation of interior designs and the visualisation of Building Information Modeling data. The results show that the Tango tablet is surprisingly preferred by most users when it comes to collaboration and discussion in our scenario. While the HoloLens offers hands-free operation and a stable tracking, users mentioned that the interaction with the Tango tablet felt more natural. In addition, users reported that it was easier to get an overall impression with the Tango tablet rather than with the HoloLens smartglasses.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tango vs. HoloLens: A Comparison of Collaborative Indoor AR Visualisations Using Hand-Held and Hands-Free Devices

Riedlinger

Oppermann

Prinz

2019

MTI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Podľa výsledkov výskumu si získal pozornosť najmä mladších návštevníkov, ktorí pozitívne hodnotili v prvom rade zábavnosť tejto formy. Starší návštevníci brali sprievodcu ako seriózny nástroj na vzdelávanie (Vlahakis, Karigiannis, Tsotros, Gounaris, 2001). Virtuálne lokácie a objekty sú teda prístupné prakticky kedykoľvek a vďaka IKT sieťam aj z ktoréhokoľvek miesta pripojeného ku globálnej sieti (Zhao, 2012).…”

Section: ý Hody N E V ý Hody a M O ž N é ú Ska L Ia P O U ž í Va Nunclassified

Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects

Formanek

Filip

Hnat

2020

Slovenský Národopis / Slovak Ethnology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper maps out the possibilities of using virtual and augmented reality in the context of virtual museums and galleries. In addition to the many advantages that virtual reality offers in new knowledge acquisition and presentation of cultural heritage objects, we also describe some possible disadvantages or problems directly related to this technology. Next, we try to find the answer to whether the presentation of selected objects of cultural heritage through virtual reality brings better results compared to the presentation in a traditional, museal form in the research part of the article. In conclusion, we summarise and present the results of the conducted research based on the statements of 138 students who participated in our testing.

show abstract

“…We include examples of virtual reality and augmented reality that can show the potential of interactions between users and information. We have identified several applications in the field of cultural heritage such as Architecture Walks, the NAI -Urban Augmented Reality, Augmented Reality Encyclopaedia (2006), the Archeoguide (Vlahakis, 2001). We also cover 3D printing technologies ( The survey in Latin America (Sperling, 2015) has revealed the use of digital fabrication in FabLabs to create historical building models, for example.…”

Section: The Topics Of the Postgraduate Digital Technology Disciplinementioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Heritage: Academic Research in Brazil in the Last Five Years

Araujo

Carlos

Sampaio

et al. 2019

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> In order to update and deepen the theoretical discussions about Digital Heritage, the authors initiated a survey of the most recent technologies that improves the documentation of architectural buildings and sites. We intend to implement a digital workflow on the studies of buildings and sites that have a potential of protection in the Fluminense lowland of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. This is part of the activities of the conservation education at bachelor level in Architecture and Urbanism, and the course of the Postgraduate Program on heritage conservation of Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ). The main objective of the current scientific research is the identification of Brazilian researchers and the subjects that have been studied in the last five years in order to make a theoretical review through the systematization of topics, thematic axis, terms, concepts regarding the application of information and communication technologies (ICT) in the heritage documentation. We carried out a qualitative-quantitative mapping of the scientific production of twelve scientific events having occurred in Brazil and Latin America between 2013 and 2018. We detected 156 Brazilian researchers from all regions of the country that had researched about Digital heritage. The mapping of themes was compared to keywords index of CIPA-ICOMOS Symposium 2017 in order to identify points of contact and lack of studies in Brazil for planning the future research. The research group seek ways for better integration between national researchers, ways to get theoretical content up-to-date and to adopt more accurate documentation practices at undergraduate and postgraduate disciplines.</p>

show abstract

Archeoguide

Cited by 181 publications

References 7 publications

Tango vs. HoloLens: A Comparison of Collaborative Indoor AR Visualisations Using Hand-Held and Hands-Free Devices

Tango vs. HoloLens: A Comparison of Collaborative Indoor AR Visualisations Using Hand-Held and Hands-Free Devices

Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects

Digital Heritage: Academic Research in Brazil in the Last Five Years

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About