2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-012-9327-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archeoseismic study of damage in Roman and Medieval structures in the center of Cologne, Germany

Abstract: The causes of damage observed in archeological records or preserved monuments are often difficult to be determined unequivocally, particularly when the possibility of secondary earthquake damage exists. Such secondary damage has been previously proposed for the Roman Praetorium, the governor's palace in the center of Cologne. Ongoing excavations since 2007 revealed additional damage. The existing ground that has been uncovered and documented extends the affected area to 175×180 m. We present a comprehensive vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most but not all observations of damage at the CAB can be related to earthquake ground motions. Figure 21 summarizes the plausibility of observed damage and potential cause for the CAB in the form a matrix (Galadini et al 2006;Hinzen et al 2012) categorizing the damage/cause relation simply feasible, questionable, or unfeasible. Plausibility is then quantified by a number between 0 and 1 (Hinzen et al 2012), meaning that none or all of the observations can be explained by a particular cause, respectively.…”
Section: Fig 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most but not all observations of damage at the CAB can be related to earthquake ground motions. Figure 21 summarizes the plausibility of observed damage and potential cause for the CAB in the form a matrix (Galadini et al 2006;Hinzen et al 2012) categorizing the damage/cause relation simply feasible, questionable, or unfeasible. Plausibility is then quantified by a number between 0 and 1 (Hinzen et al 2012), meaning that none or all of the observations can be explained by a particular cause, respectively.…”
Section: Fig 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 21 summarizes the plausibility of observed damage and potential cause for the CAB in the form a matrix (Galadini et al 2006;Hinzen et al 2012) categorizing the damage/cause relation simply feasible, questionable, or unfeasible. Plausibility is then quantified by a number between 0 and 1 (Hinzen et al 2012), meaning that none or all of the observations can be explained by a particular cause, respectively. Six causes are linked to 11 observations which have been discussed above with the highest score of 63% possibility assigned to a seismogenic origin.…”
Section: Fig 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is an increasing interest in using these techniques in several fields: heritage (Teza and Pesci, 2013;Hinzen et al, 2013;Tapete et al, 2013), medicine, geological survey and computer vision (Lubowiecka et al, 2011). Applications of the techniques have been used in construction safety (Prokop and Panholzer, 2009), load monitoring of structures (Pesci et al, 2012), disaster management (Mikoš et al, 2005) and construction progress evaluation (Turkan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an increasing interest in using these techniques in several fields: heritage (Teza and Pesci, 2013;Hinzen et al, 2013;Tapete et al, 2013), medicine, geological survey and computer vision (Lubowiecka et al, 2011). Applications of the techniques have been used in construction safety (Prokop and Panholzer, 2009), load monitoring of structures (Pesci et al, 2012), disaster management (Mikoš et al, 2005) and construction progress evaluation (Turkan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%