2010
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200900604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architectural Repertoire of Ligand‐Binding Pockets on Protein Surfaces

Abstract: Knowledge of the three-dimensional structure of ligand binding sites in proteins provides valuable information for computer-assisted drug design. We present a method for the automated extraction and classification of ligand binding site topologies, in which protein surface cavities are represented as branched frameworks. The procedure employs a growing neural gas approach for pocket topology assignment and pocket framework generation. We assessed the structural diversity of 623 known ligand binding site topolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[92] The use of pure geometric representations such as shape curvatures, spherical harmonics, wavelet coefficients or pocket frameworks has also been explored. [93,94] For example, Weisel et al [94] used graph-based pocket frameworks to show that ligand-binding cavities can be described with a limited number of topologies. Kahraman et al [95] used pure shape descriptors to compare binding sites and ligands and arrived to the conclusion that the assumption that binding sites that interact with similar ligands have similar geometries is only partially true.…”
Section: Binding Site Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[92] The use of pure geometric representations such as shape curvatures, spherical harmonics, wavelet coefficients or pocket frameworks has also been explored. [93,94] For example, Weisel et al [94] used graph-based pocket frameworks to show that ligand-binding cavities can be described with a limited number of topologies. Kahraman et al [95] used pure shape descriptors to compare binding sites and ligands and arrived to the conclusion that the assumption that binding sites that interact with similar ligands have similar geometries is only partially true.…”
Section: Binding Site Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pocket frameworks encoding binding pocket similarities were also used to create protein binding site similarity networks (Weisel et al, 2010). Pocket frameworks are reduced, graph-based representations of pocket geometries generated by the software PocketGraph using a growing neural gas approach.…”
Section: Areas Of Drug Design: An Assessment Of Network-related Admentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently the problem of drug solubility prediction from structure has been revisited (Jorgensen & Duffy, 2002). The prediction of physico-chemical properties of organic compounds from molecular structure has been extensively studied using hybrid techniques that include neural networks (Taskinen & Yliruusi, 2003;Weisel et al, 2010;Pal & Panja, 2013). Also identification of small-molecule ligands has been improved using neural techniques (Durrant & McCammon, 2010;Durrant and McCammon 2011;Romero Reyes et al, 2013).…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%