2020
DOI: 10.1080/14608944.2020.1812825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture in National Identities: a critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The themes of national architectural identity are represented by three main points, namely typology, remembrance (memorial), and geopolitics (Pandya, 2020). Typology gives a dialectical emphasis on the local culture and the political environment.…”
Section: Themementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The themes of national architectural identity are represented by three main points, namely typology, remembrance (memorial), and geopolitics (Pandya, 2020). Typology gives a dialectical emphasis on the local culture and the political environment.…”
Section: Themementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is a distinction between a symbol, a sign, and a metaphor in other scientific and creative settings (e.g., semiotics), this book employs the words as synonyms that complement 54 one another, and the term symbolism is used to define the notion of the usage of the symbol. In the architecture of the second half of the 20th century, the debate and discussions of symbolism were mostly associated with an emphasis on the notional component, phenomenological approaches (Norberg-Schulz) 57 and semiotics as a science. In the 1960ies, symbolism as one of the qualities of postmodernist architecture was analyzed in the works of Robert Venturi, Charles Jencks and Umberto Eco.…”
Section: International Opennessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In postcolonial contexts, national power dynamics operate within even more complex geopolitical frameworks (Said, 2008), requiring deeper dismantling of hegemonic constructs. In order to critically understand the development of architecture as a reflection of a nation, analysis needs to be advanced beyond studying the typologies of national civic monuments, or typological concerns of configuration of architectural form and function (Pandya, 2020), by incorporating a historical understanding of the development of styles and trends that shaped the architectural milieu and the architects and stakeholders involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%