2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2212.06167
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architectures for Multinode Superconducting Quantum Computers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being fully compatible with superconducting qubits in a millikelvin environment, such a device will facilitate the integration of remote superconducting quantum processors into a single coherent optical quantum network. This is relevant not only for modularization and scaling (40,41) but also for efficient crossplatform verification of classically intractable quantum processor results (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being fully compatible with superconducting qubits in a millikelvin environment, such a device will facilitate the integration of remote superconducting quantum processors into a single coherent optical quantum network. This is relevant not only for modularization and scaling (40,41) but also for efficient crossplatform verification of classically intractable quantum processor results (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being fully compatible with superconducting qubits in a millikelvin environment such a device will facilitate the integration of remote superconducting quantum processors into a single coherent optical quantum network. This is not only relevant for modularization and scaling [33,34], but also for efficient cross-platform verification of classically intractable quantum processor results [35]. diagonal covariance matrix elements from the calibrated measurement record,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a larger scale, Ang et al [48] have developed architectures for superconducting modular, distributed, or multinode quantum computers (MNQC), employing a 'co-design' inspired approach to quantify overall MNQC performance in terms of hardware models of internode links, entanglement distillation, and local architecture. In the particular case of superconducting MNQCs with microwave-to-optical interconnects, Ang et al [48], describe how compilers and software should optimize the balance between local gates and internode gates, discuss when noisy quantum internode links have an advantage over purely classical links, and introduce a research roadmap for the realization of early MNQCs. This roadmap illustrates potential improvements to the hardware and software of MNQCs and outlines criteria for evaluating the improvement landscape, from progress in entanglement generation to the use of quantum memory in entanglement distillation and dedicated algorithms such as distributed quantum phase estimation.…”
Section: Hybrid Distributed Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This perspective article can be looked upon as a self-contained second part of a research and review paper [1] that stopped short at the beginning of the current engineering era of scaling up devices and building quantum computing ecosystems. The purpose is to focus on addressing the quite dramatic development during the subsequent five years, trying to "predict the future" based on current visions, roadmaps, efforts and investments that aim for the next ten years [46][47][48], outlining a sustainable quantum evolution that hopefully survives the quantum hype [49,50]. To be able to do so in this brief article, we will frequently refer to [1] and to recent reviews for basic background, technology, and methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%