1996
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-60800-1_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architectures for natural language generation: Problems and perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This criticism is not the only one against RST. This discourse framework has already been criticized in the generation community (de Smedt et al, 1996). So we advocate the use of SDRT.…”
Section: Comparison With Rstmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This criticism is not the only one against RST. This discourse framework has already been criticized in the generation community (de Smedt et al, 1996). So we advocate the use of SDRT.…”
Section: Comparison With Rstmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As most of the earlier developed NLG systems adhered to this, it is considered that pipeline architecture is the consensus architecture that can be easily and effectively utilized for language generation tasks [73]. There are quite significant Table 1 shows the list of these tasks categorized under three main modules in pipeline architecture.…”
Section: Pipeline Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, it has long been argued that neither natural language understanding nor its counterpart, natural language generation, should be seen as strictly pipeline processes from larger-scale to smaller-scale structures (de Smedt et al, 1996). There are certainly interesting interplays between large scale argument structure and lexical choice, to take just one example (Reed, 1999).…”
Section: Argument Reconstruction: Presuppositions and Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%