Architektur und Design psychiatrischer Einrichtungen

Richter, Dirk; Hoffmann, Holger

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1360032

Cited by 15 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…After removing duplicates, 321 were manually screened, and 286 records were excluded for title and abstract. We reviewed the full text of 35 studies, 24 of which were excluded [11,12,14,18,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Finally, eleven SRs were included in the narrative synthesis ( Figure 1).…”

Section: Literature Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of “Systematic Reviews” of the Built Environment’s Effects on Mental Health

Núñez-González

Delgado‐Ron

Gault

et al. 2020

Journal of Environmental and Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Good mental health is related to mental and psychological well-being, and there is growing interest in the potential role of the built environment on mental health, yet the evidence base underpinning the direct or indirect effects of the built environment is not fully clear. The aim of this overview is to assess the effect of the built environment on mental health-related outcomes. Methods. This study provides an overview of published systematic reviews (SRs) that assess the effect of the built environment on mental health. We reported the overview according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases searched until November 2019 included the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE (OVID 1946 to present), LILACS, and PsycINFO. Two authors independently selected reviews, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using the Assessing Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2). Results. In total, 357 records were identified from a structured search of five databases combined with the references of the included studies, and eleven SRs were included in the narrative synthesis. Outcomes included mental health and well-being, depression and stress, and psychological distress. According to AMSTAR-2 scores, the quality assessment of the included SRs was categorized as “high” in two SRs and as “critically low” in nine SRs. According to the conclusions of the SRs reported by the authors, only one SR reported a “beneficial” effect on mental health and well-being outcomes. Conclusion. There was insufficient evidence to make firm conclusions on the effects of built environment interventions on mental health outcomes (well-being, depression and stress, and psychological distress). The evidence collected reported high heterogeneity (outcomes and measures) and a moderate- to low-quality assessment among the included SRs.

show abstract

Section: Literature Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of “Systematic Reviews” of the Built Environment’s Effects on Mental Health

Núñez-González

Delgado‐Ron

Gault

et al. 2020

Journal of Environmental and Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…У процесі реалізації концепції деінституціалізації були прийняті важливі базові міжнародні документи, зокрема, законодавчі акти щодо організації надання психіатричної та психологічної допомоги, санітарно-містобудівне психічними розладами та медичних працівників. Вимоги до сучасних психіатричних закладів включають раціональні і функціональні просторові рішення, які адаптовані до сучасних методів лікування та реабілітації, відповідають вимогам інклюзивності, мають сучасний комфортний дизайн і набір необхідних приміщень для забезпечення приватності і належної соціалізації пацієнтів з психічними розладами та створення цілющого середовища для них [14,15].…”

Section: Belov Oleksandr Oleksandrovуchunclassified

Реформування Системи Охорони Психічного Здоров’я Населення Країн Світу В Контексті Архітектурно-Планувальних Рішень Сучасних Закладів Охорони Здоров’я

Белов,

Гаркавий,

Хоменко

et al. 2024

Перспективи та інновації науки

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is devoted to the reform of the mental health care system (deinstitutionalization) in the context of architectural and planning solutions of modern mental health care institutions (psychological (psychiatric) care centers, psychiatric departments in general hospitals, psychiatric day hospitals, dispensaries, etc.) New alternative mental health institutions should provide modern methods of treatment, rehabilitation, inclusiveness, as well as a comfortable, safe private internal environment, and socialization of patients with mental disorders. Architectural and design solutions in countries around the world are reviewed by the hospital's stakeholders -a multidisciplinary team (architect, quality manager, medical professionals (psychiatrists, medical psychologists), etc. The construction of new psychiatric healthcare facilities involves creating conditions for medical staff that would satisfy and motivate their professional needs and effective work, create appropriate conditions for visual monitoring of patients during exacerbations of the disease and for protection against their aggressive actions, eliminate stigma, reduce emotional burnout and chronic fatigue of staff.In the design and construction of new mental health facilities in developed countries, much attention is paid to the layout of the premises of the healthcare facility, their decoration, and the color scheme of the interior environment.It is also advisable to place artwork by patients themselves on the walls (art therapy) to enhance the therapeutic and rehabilitation effect, reduce anxiety and aggression in patients with mental disorders.

show abstract

Stigmatisierung von Menschen mit einer psychischen Erkrankung

Wallner¹

2022

Springer Reference Pflege – Therapie – Gesundheit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Architektur und Design psychiatrischer Einrichtungen

Abstract: We found positive outcomes independent from the intervention in detail. This result should be interpreted in the light of the generally low study quality and further methodological problems.

Cited by 15 publications

References 28 publications

Overview of “Systematic Reviews” of the Built Environment’s Effects on Mental Health

Overview of “Systematic Reviews” of the Built Environment’s Effects on Mental Health

Реформування Системи Охорони Психічного Здоров’я Населення Країн Світу В Контексті Архітектурно-Планувальних Рішень Сучасних Закладів Охорони Здоров’я

Stigmatisierung von Menschen mit einer psychischen Erkrankung

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About