Archival research: a neglected method in organization studies

Abstract

Purpose Archival research is a much under-rated and under-utilized method of research in management studies. Yet multi-disciplinary undertakings being observed in recent times, such as in knowledge management (KM) systems, business history and social network studies, among others, indicate that there is a lot of potential to be explored. The purpose of this paper is to highlight this point and make a case for its inclusion in the researcher’s toolkit in the future. Design/methodology/approach The authors follow a two-stage method here: the first stage being an improvised process to benchmark articles for this review; while the second stage involves content analysis and synthesis of the same. Findings The authors have dealt with the intricacies of the archival research methodology by minutely examining the fieldwork steps, proxies generation, other related processes of triangulation, etc. With the discussion on “multi-disciplinary undertakings,” the authors offer not only a selective bibliography of works that have effectively harvested this family of methods, but also critique the nuances involved. Finally, coming into more contemporary concerns and developments, the authors undertake an in-depth look at technological applications in the domain of KM, in case study mode. Methodological richness leads to substantive granularity. As such, the authors argue that archival methods contribute to the robustness, contextuality and holism of any research endeavor, more so in the study of business and organizations. Research limitations/implications This paper is based on the literature review. Practical implications This paper makes a case for archival method’s contribution toward the robustness, contextuality and holism of any research endeavor, more so in the study of business and organizations. Originality/value This paper re-positions the method of archival research as a viable and sophisticated tool for researchers to employ effectively in singular or mixed method studies.

Investigating the implementation of and accountability in PPPs: a case study in public water management

“…Third, using document analysis as a research method has been relatively neglected in accounting and finance research (Loughran and Mc Donald, 2016). This study fills the gap by following the path of a few inter-disciplinary studies that have successfully used a similar research method to analyse organisational change issues (Broadbent et al, 2010;Das, 2018). Critics argue that document analysis does not provide enough or robust data for a case study (Ahrens and Chapman, 2006).…”

Teaching business as business

“…In this research, we retrieved and analyzed the digital versions of the catalogues. In the field of business and management history, archival data are often used for explaining processes of change and evolution, for challenging existing theories and for building new theoretical models (Barnes et al , 2018; Das et al , 2018). In our case, the decision to rely on a qualitative content analysis of archival records was based on the longitudinal nature of our inquiry and on the availability of digitalized and official HBS documents.…”

Small business marketing strategies for physical therapy practice owners

“…When researchers review company documents they have the advantage of a broader context for understanding the participants responses during interview (Dasgupta, 2015;Kornbluh, 2015). Other authors have noted that archival documents can be used to add robustness and a comprehensive overall impression of the data (Das, Jain, & Mishra, 2018). The further evidence of archival documents enhances triangulation of sources (Yin, 2014).…”

“…However, there are several disadvantages of using company documents in qualitative research. One disadvantage is reporting bias of the author or participant (Das et al, 2018). The chosen documents may reflect the opinion of the person who chose them, which is a potential source of bias (Miyazaki & Taylor, 2008).…”