Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1143997.1144060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archive-based cooperative coevolutionary algorithms

Abstract: Archive-based cooperative coevolutionary algorithms attempt to retain a set of individuals which act as good collaborators for other coevolved individuals in the evolutionary system. We introduce a new archive-based algorithm, called iCCEA, which compares favorably with other cooperative coevolutionary algorithms. We explain the current problems with cooperative coevolution which have given rise to archive methods, detail the iCCEA algorithm, compare it against other traditional and archive-based methods on ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An archive-based collaboration model (Panait et al 2006), a variant of 1 + N collaboration model, maintains collaborators in archives, one per population. The archives preserve useful information in past generations.…”
Section: Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An archive-based collaboration model (Panait et al 2006), a variant of 1 + N collaboration model, maintains collaborators in archives, one per population. The archives preserve useful information in past generations.…”
Section: Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those individuals who mostly help individuals from other populations to improve themselves are intended to be good collaborators and encouraged to collaborate with new individuals in the next generation. Panait et al (2006) designed their archives with a dynamic size. Initially, the archive of each population was a copy of the population itself.…”
Section: Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even this upper bound is problematic: large values of N are more accurate and more likely to converge to the optimum; but may require more total number of evaluations than is realistic given the evaluation budget. Thus recent empirical work [2,9] has focused on reducing the total number of evaluations by identifying an archive of individuals from the collaborating population(s) which provide as good an assessment as testing with the entire collaborating population would provide. As it turns out, this archive size can be very small, resulting in a significant reduction in evaluations.…”
Section: The Evolutionary Game Theory Infinite Population Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals of a subpopulation are evaluated by aggregation with individuals of other subpopulations. Multi-species cooperative co-evolution has been applied to various problems [43,55,54,22,36,66], including learning problems [8], and some theoretical analyses have been recently proposed, see [48,10,52], or [65] for an analysis considering a relationship between cooperative co-evolution and evolutionary game theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%