2015
DOI: 10.1090/tran/6570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arcs, balls and spheres that cannot be attractors in $\mathbb {R}^3$

Abstract: For any compact set K ⊆ R 3 we define a number r(K) that is either a nonnegative integer or ∞. Intuitively, r(K) provides some information on how wildly K sits in R 3 . We show that attractors for discrete or continuous dynamical systems have finite r and then prove that certain arcs, balls and spheres cannot be attractors by showing that their r is infinite.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) The conditions laid out in Theorem 2 are sufficient, but not necessary, to guarantee that a surface (even a surface with a totally disconnected set of wild points) cannot be an attractor. A suitable example is the horned sphere S of Alexander, which cannot be realized as an attractor (this is proved in [20]) but whose set of wild points is a rectifiable Cantor set because it is contained in a straight line by construction. The Alexander sphere is shown in Figure 3 and described carefully in [6,Chapter 2].…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(2) The conditions laid out in Theorem 2 are sufficient, but not necessary, to guarantee that a surface (even a surface with a totally disconnected set of wild points) cannot be an attractor. A suitable example is the horned sphere S of Alexander, which cannot be realized as an attractor (this is proved in [20]) but whose set of wild points is a rectifiable Cantor set because it is contained in a straight line by construction. The Alexander sphere is shown in Figure 3 and described carefully in [6,Chapter 2].…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 1 is proved in the very brief Section 2, where we also discuss succintly the relation between wildness and tameness. In Section 3 we recall from [20] the definition and properties of certain number r(K) that can be associated to any compact set K ⊆ R 3 and somehow measures its "crookedness" as a subset of Euclidean space. This r(K) is finite in the case of attractors, and it is because of this property that it allows us to uncouple the topological and dynamical arguments underlying the proof of Theorem 2: dynamics will enter the picture only through the condition that r of an attractor is finite whereas the hard work is on the topological side, in Sections 4 and 5.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations