2018
DOI: 10.7765/9781526131645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arctic governance

Abstract: This electronic version has been made freely available under a Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, which permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction provided the author(s) and Manchester University Press are fully cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. Details of the licence can be viewed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. The publisher has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for any external or third-party internet websites referred to i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(166 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the concern of Arctic (local, regional) entities regarding the involvement of external (national, international) entities in Arctic regional governance constitutes a recurring theme in the regional seal governance discourse. This apprehension is also reflected in larger Arctic governance debates regarding the inclusion and intrusion of external entities in Arctic affairs, from their presence in institutions, like the AC (Wilson Rowe, 2018), to governance issues, such as sustainability (Coates & Holroyd, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the concern of Arctic (local, regional) entities regarding the involvement of external (national, international) entities in Arctic regional governance constitutes a recurring theme in the regional seal governance discourse. This apprehension is also reflected in larger Arctic governance debates regarding the inclusion and intrusion of external entities in Arctic affairs, from their presence in institutions, like the AC (Wilson Rowe, 2018), to governance issues, such as sustainability (Coates & Holroyd, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The term "debt-trap diplomacy" has been used to criticize Chinese development loans to countries with high debt levels, such as in Sri Lanka where the government was unable to repay a Chinese loan to build a port and transferred control of the port to a Chinese operator (Chellaney, 2017). The usefulness and accuracy of the term have been disputed (Freeman, 2017;Rajah et al, 2019).…”
Section: Possible Barriers Of Entry To Arctic Governance Involvement:mentioning
confidence: 99%