2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10874-011-9186-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arctic mercury depletion and its quantitative link with halogens

Abstract: Gas phase elemental mercury (Hg°) was measured aboard the NASA DC-8 research aircraft during the Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) campaign conducted in spring 2008 primarily over the North American Arctic. We examined the vertical distributions of Hg°and ozone (O 3 ) together with tetrachloroethylene (C 2 Cl 4 ), ethyne (C 2 H 2 ), and alkanes when Hg°-and O 3 -depleted air masses were sampled near the surface (<1 km). This study suggests that Hg°a nd … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(52 reference statements)
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, it has been determined that polar mercury chemistry results from GEM oxidation by halogens , and is confined to the shallow atmospheric boundary layer (typically less then a few hundreds of meters; Banic et al, 2003;Tackett et al, 2007;Mao et al, 2010). RGM production and deposition is considered the predominant pathway for mercury deposition to the polar regions as GEM itself does not condense or significantly dry deposit (dry deposit is very slow), and is not significantly adsorbed onto snow and ice surfaces (Lindberg et al, 2002;BartelsRauch et al, 2002;Ferrari et al, 2004).…”
Section: Prior Polar Mercury Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it has been determined that polar mercury chemistry results from GEM oxidation by halogens , and is confined to the shallow atmospheric boundary layer (typically less then a few hundreds of meters; Banic et al, 2003;Tackett et al, 2007;Mao et al, 2010). RGM production and deposition is considered the predominant pathway for mercury deposition to the polar regions as GEM itself does not condense or significantly dry deposit (dry deposit is very slow), and is not significantly adsorbed onto snow and ice surfaces (Lindberg et al, 2002;BartelsRauch et al, 2002;Ferrari et al, 2004).…”
Section: Prior Polar Mercury Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calvert and Lindberg (2005) questioned the role of OH radical under atmospheric conditions. Atomic halogens (Br and Cl) have been invoked to explain the simultaneous decrease in concentrations of both O 3 and Hg(0) in mercury depletion events (Steffen et al 2008, references therein;Obrist et al, 2011;Mao et al, 2011). Field data in the marine boundary layer has been analyzed to suggest a major role for Br in initiating Hg(0) oxidation (Sprovieri et al, 2010a), and recent models suggest that Br plays a dominant role in mercury cycling in the global troposphere (Holmes et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there has been only one study on atmospheric mercury in the arctic mid-troposphere during the spring and summer, but no measurements have been made during the fall. During this measurement campaign, the concentrations of mercury were near the tropospheric background [27], which would have had a strong dilution capacity over Nanjing. By contrast, concentrations over the South China Sea and Taiwan measured by Sheu et al [12] were near 2.0 ng•m −3 , and GEM in Okinawa [20] was much higher than the northern hemispheric background, close to the concentrations observed in the July episode when air masses arrived from over the East China Sea and the Pacific passing between Taiwan and Okinawa.…”
Section: Tropospheric Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by values reported for widely varied geographical locations in the literature. Free tropospheric mercury concentrations over the Arctic range from less than 0.5 ng•m −3 during Arctic mercury depletion events to 2.2 ng•m −3 [27], while at altitudes from the surface to the tropopause over diverse areas including Mexico City, Houston, TX, Alaska, and Hawaii concentrations ranged from below detection limits to greater than 1.5 ng•m −3 [29]. Ground-based measurements within the free troposphere also show diverse average concentrations from 2.1 ng•m −3 in Taiwan to ~1.5 ng•m −3 on Storm Peak, CO [12,26].…”
Section: Tropospheric Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%