Are adrenaline autoinjectors fit for purpose? A pilot study of the mechanical and injection performance characteristics of a cartridge- versus a syringe-based autoinjector

Abstract

Background:Adrenaline autoinjectors (AAIs) are prescribed to facilitate the intramuscular administration of adrenaline in patients diagnosed with life-threatening anaphylaxis. This pilot study investigated the injection and functional properties of two AAIs (deploying different delivery systems) under standard conditions, after dynamic and mechanical stresses, and in the presence of denim.Methods:The differences between a cartridge-based AAI (EpiPen® Junior) and a syringe-based AAI (Anapen® Junior) were assessed using three sets of tests. Test 1: under standard conditions, the injection depth and dose were measured in ballistic gelatine (a validated tissue simulant). Test 2: before the safety cap removal and activation forces were measured, AAIs were subjected to either of two preconditioning tests: 1) free-fall drop test; or 2) static load (ie, 400 N, equivalent to 40 kg weight) test; or 3) no preconditioning. Test 3: under standard conditions, injection properties into ballistic gelatine in the presence and absence of denim were investigated. Statistical analyses were performed using the Student’s t-test or Welch’s test.Results:The maximum depth of delivery was significantly greater with cartridge AAI (n = 4, mean 21.09 ± 2.54 mm) than with syringe AAI (n = 5; mean 11.64 ± 0.80 mm; P = 0.003). After 2.5 seconds, cartridge AAI (n = 4) discharged significantly more dose than syringe AAI (n = 3; 74.3% versus 25.7% of total dose; P = 0.001). Both cartridge and syringe AAI withstood the free-fall drop test, but almost all devices failed to activate following the static load test. Under standard conditions, significantly less force was required to remove the safety cap of cartridge AAI than syringe AAI (both n = 15; mean 9.56 ± 2.36 N versus 20.23 ± 6.61 N, respectively; P < 0.001), but a significantly greater activation force was required for cartridge AAI than syringe AAI (mean 23.01 ± 3.96 N versus 8.06 ± 0.51 N, respectively; P < 0.001). The presence of denim did not alter the activation force or effective needle length of either of the AAIs.Conclusion:Cartridge AAI appears significantly more capable of consistently and rapidly delivering a clinically relevant dose of intramuscular adrenaline than syringe AAI. However, both devices showed shortcomings in their ability to sustain mechanical stress similar to that which is likely over their shelf life, and as such, may not be fit for life-saving purpose.

Haematological and Biochemical Changes in Response to Stress Induced by the Administration of Amikacin Injection by Autoinjector in Animals

“…The four autoinjectors used in this study also showed same quantity of drug delivery. The injectable needle length was within the range and recommended for the autoinjector devices 12,13 . The autoinjectors meant for intramuscular injection in human being was used in the study with a modification of two volume deliveries -full volume injection and partial volume injection.…”

Drug-device combination products in the twenty-first century: epinephrine auto-injector development using human factors engineering

“…However, concerns about the mechanical performance of EAIs are reported from time to time [34,40,41]. [17] Manufacturers should work with the FDA to produce simple, well-designed devices, taking into consideration the human factors aspect and the physical environment that houses the device Zhang et al (2003) [18] Heuristic evaluation is a useful, efficient, low-cost method for evaluating patient-safety features of medical devices through the identification of usability problems and their severity Gurses et al (2012) [19] Human factors and ergonomics must play a more prominent role in accelerating improvements in patient safety Warburton (2005) [20] Changes aimed at error reduction must be implemented to be cost effective and with an understanding of HFE and safety science Lin et al (2001) [21] A new interface, designed using HFE, eliminated drug-concentration errors, while the simulated commercially available interface did not Price et al (1999) [22] HFE can improve device preference: most patient and nurses preferred Easi-Breathe over the conventional metered-dose inhaler for ease of use/training…”

Estudio y caracterización del Autoinyectable de atropina-oxima DEF: diseño de nuevos Autoinyectables para Defensa NBQ y otros medicamentos de urgencia

“…Es una de las 97 presentaciones de la relación de medicamentos fabricados por los Servicios Farmacéuticos del Ministerio de Defensa Español 28 , con número OTAN de Codificación -N.O.C.-6505 33 0051675, y Código Nacional -C.N.-número 698712. Está indicado en el tratamiento de la exposición a agentes nerviosos (neurotóxicos).…”