2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00673.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are All Discount Rates Equal? A Note on Time Preferences Across Public and Private Benefits in Michigan's Upper Peninsula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Policy makers in counties with stagnate job growth may feel pressured to act quickly to satisfy the electorate (Loveridge et al. ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Policy makers in counties with stagnate job growth may feel pressured to act quickly to satisfy the electorate (Loveridge et al. ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poverty (Dewees, Lobao, and Swanson 2003;Fleischmann, Green, and Kwong 1992), unemployment (Saiz 2001), and median income affect economic development policy and policy makers may react to local economic conditions when forming these policies. For example, slower growing locations may be more aggressive in economic development policy, all else equal-whereas Loveridge et al (2010) find that this is often due to the public's high rate of time preference for community job creation. The presence or dominance of certain economic sectors impacts economic development activities.…”
Section: Economic Development Incentives 363mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the rate of return in certain financial markets may not accurately approximate the social discount rate of goods such job creation. Furthermore, as Loveridge et al (2010) note, a high discount rate for job creation (26%) also might explain the reluctance of policy makers for longer, asset based approaches to local economic development. The jobs creation discount rate might also be useful in the future in efforts to use public opinion in national unemployment forecasting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Warner and Pleeter 2001;Plantation 1984;Hausman 1979;Gilman 1976). Loveridge et al (2010) suggest that community level characteristics can explain a portion of the variation in both private and social discount rates. In this light, for forecasting community-or regional-level job outcomes, the local area effects on an individual's preferences could be useful in ways similar to more traditional expectations variables.…”
Section: Discounting Literaturementioning
confidence: 97%