2021
DOI: 10.1037/rel0000247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are atheists unprejudiced? Forms of nonbelief and prejudice toward antiliberal and mainstream religious groups.

Abstract: Building on the ideological-conflict hypothesis, we argue that, beyond the religion-prejudice association, there should exist an irreligion-prejudice association toward groups perceived as actively opposing the values of nonbelievers (antiliberal targets) or even as simply being ideologically different: religionists of mainstream religions. Collecting data from three secularized Western European countries (total N ϭ 1,158), we found that, though both believers and nonbelievers disliked moral and religious anti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine whether the belief styles underlying fundamentalism and authoritarianism are also involved in nonreligious prejudice, we selected measures including dogmatism (rigidity of one's belief), intellectual humility (capacity to recognize that one's belief may be wrong), and belief superiority (belief in the correctness of one's belief compared to what others believe). Research has provided evidence for these measures to be applicable to both sides of the religious spectrum (Hopkin, Hoyle, & Toner, 2014;Toner, Leary, Asher, & Jongman-Sereno, 2013;Uzarevic et al, 2019). Although theoretically distinct, we hypothesized that all three constructs represented plausible mechanisms for prejudice toward Christians, with atheists displaying the greatest endorsement.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To examine whether the belief styles underlying fundamentalism and authoritarianism are also involved in nonreligious prejudice, we selected measures including dogmatism (rigidity of one's belief), intellectual humility (capacity to recognize that one's belief may be wrong), and belief superiority (belief in the correctness of one's belief compared to what others believe). Research has provided evidence for these measures to be applicable to both sides of the religious spectrum (Hopkin, Hoyle, & Toner, 2014;Toner, Leary, Asher, & Jongman-Sereno, 2013;Uzarevic et al, 2019). Although theoretically distinct, we hypothesized that all three constructs represented plausible mechanisms for prejudice toward Christians, with atheists displaying the greatest endorsement.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Because the religious landscape is relatively alike in our four research contexts (Australia, Finland, Germany, Norway), and because Uzarevic, Saroglou, and Muñoz-García (2019) have demonstrated interreligious attitudes of atheists to be similar across nations, we expect to observe the same pattern of results in all four national subsamples.…”
Section: Present Studymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…nonliberal or religious groups), and show a lack of flexibility in taking a different perspective. 85,86,87 None of this is particularly unexpected or surprising and it has certainly not been our intention here to present the nonreligious as superior-morally or otherwhise-to religious individuals, an obviously flawed approach. What we have attempted here was, on the one hand, to point out the historical neglect, and the conceptual and methodological biases on this topic.…”
Section: Conclusion: Rethinking the Study Of Religion Nonreligion Amentioning
confidence: 95%