2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.888747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Average Growth Rate and Volatility Related?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid taking a stance and explore the potentially differential effects of the two shock components, we continue the empirical analysis both with and without time fixed effects. 16 The above results avoided the lag structure of the response of growth to shocks by aggregating over 5-year interval. We henceforth focus on an annual panel of 65 countries between 1960 and 2000 and extend the specification above as follows:…”
Section: Amplification Effect Of Credit Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To avoid taking a stance and explore the potentially differential effects of the two shock components, we continue the empirical analysis both with and without time fixed effects. 16 The above results avoided the lag structure of the response of growth to shocks by aggregating over 5-year interval. We henceforth focus on an annual panel of 65 countries between 1960 and 2000 and extend the specification above as follows:…”
Section: Amplification Effect Of Credit Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In light of these results, we use 16 A proxy for shocks more commonly used in the growth literature is changes in the terms of trade. We prefer to use commodity-price shocks because the time variation in exchange rates that enters the terms of trade calculation is largely endogenous to the business cycle.…”
Section: Amplification Effect Of Credit Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Complementary evidence is provided by Blattman, Hwang and Williamson (2004), Koren and Tenreyro (2007), and others. See, however, Chatterjee and Shukayev (2005) and Ramey and Ramey (2006) for a debate on how sensitive these findings are to the particular measurement of output growth. specifications from Ramey and Ramey (1995) in our dataset.…”
Section: Some Motivating Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appendix Table 1 (WTA) to obtain commodity weights. 15 Each country-product specific weight is equal to the net exports of that commodity, divided by the country's total net exports, N X ic /N X i . Note that these weights are constant over time for a given country, but vary across countries.…”
Section: Loyaza and Beck (2000)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using regional data for 48 US States from 1970 to 1988, Dawson and Stephanson (1997) find a negative relationship between growth and its standard deviation but the coefficient is only significant at the 10% level. Using a similar data set, Chatterjee and Shukayev (2006) find a negative relationship between the average per capita growth rate and its standard deviation but the coefficient is only significant at the 5% level when the growth rates are calculated as log changes but are not significant based on percentage changes. Using regional data for 10 Canadian provinces from 1961 to 2000, Dejuan and Gurr (2004) find a positive but statistically insignificant relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%