Are breeding sites a limiting factor for the Tandilean redbelly toad (Bufonidae) in pampean highland grasslands?

Abstract

The selection of breeding sites in response to temporary pond characteristics has been frequently documented in several anuran species. Small and shallow temporary ponds are usually preferred. The Tandilean red-belly toad, Melanophryniscus aff. montevidensis, is an endemic species that breeds in temporary ponds of remnants of highland grasslands in Tandilia mountain system, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. The goals of this work are to characterize breeding sites of Tandilean red-belly toad, and to assess the availability of potential breeding sites at remnants of highland grasslands. Tandilean red-belly toad was observed using ponds and temporary creeks in valleys and slopes of mountains. The median of dimensions for the breeding sites was 8m length, 4m wide and 10cm depth (n = 40). The majority of the breeding sites were circular and of natural origin. The dominant breeding site substrates were mud and vegetation. We found 115 potential breeding sites in grassland remnants of surroundings of Tandil city, giving a density of 7.1 potential breeding sites/km 2 . The density of potential breeding sites in highland grasslands of Tandilia Mountains was similar in most surveyed remnants. Therefore, our results suggest that size of remnant is not affecting the breeding habitat availability.

Local extinction of Melanophryniscus montevidensis (Anura: Bufonidae) in the Argentine Pampas

“…montevidensis belongs to the M. stelzneri group. It inhabits a narrow corridor of sandy dunes along the Rio de la Plata shoreline and Atlantic coast in Uruguay (Langone 1995, Núñez et al 2004, Maneyro and Kwet 2008 and Alvorada (Barra do Chui) at the southern extreme of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (Tedros et al 2001, Bernardo-Silva et al 2012 (Cairo et al 2008, Cortelezzi et al 2015, Friedman et al 2016, Kacoliris et al 2017. In older works these populations were assigned to the Uruguayan species M. montevidensis based on coloration similarities (Cei 1980, Gallardo 1987, Gallardo and Varela de Olmedo 1992, but Klappenbach and Langone (1992), based on geographical distribution, concluded that they could be different species, a hypothesis supported by Cespedez et al (2000).…”