2020
DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Carbon-fiber Implants More Efficacious Than Traditional Metallic Implants for Spine Tumor Surgery?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is worth mentioning that PEEK has a high transmittance, which enables doctors to more clearly observe the local reactions and tumor recurrence after surgery through CT or MRI, giving it unique advantages over traditional metal implants in the field of bone tumors (such as spinal tumors) [ 154 ].…”
Section: Polymer Materials Of 3d-printed Bone Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is worth mentioning that PEEK has a high transmittance, which enables doctors to more clearly observe the local reactions and tumor recurrence after surgery through CT or MRI, giving it unique advantages over traditional metal implants in the field of bone tumors (such as spinal tumors) [ 154 ].…”
Section: Polymer Materials Of 3d-printed Bone Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, lower tensile strength may contribute to failure with compressive and shear forces, implant failure is difficult to assess, and the implant options available remain limited. [13,14] Given the limited data that currently exists pertaining to these radiolucent implants, this study sought to query the perspectives of the specialists in the North American Spine Society (NASS) section of Spinal Oncology with regards to their clinical utility, current practice patterns, and recommended future directions. Given the lack of data in the literature, our a priori hypothesis was that opinions wouldl vary widely even among these specialists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current literature on CF and CFR-PEEK radiolucent implants is sparse for both biomechanical and clinical studies, and these implants have their own set of disadvantages. For example, lower tensile strength may contribute to failure with compressive and shear forces, implant failure is difficult to assess, and the implant options available remain limited [ 13 , 14 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiolucency allows earlier detection of postoperative complications and local recurrence, which can significantly impact the patient’s quality of life and future treatment decisions. Carbon fibre/polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) is a relatively novel material that offers an ideal balance of radiolucency and biomechanical properties suited for tumour applications [ 2 ]. Reinforcement of polyetheretherketone by carbon fibre increases its rigidity and elastic modulus closer to bone, reducing the risk of hardware failure while avoiding artefact generation on imaging [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%