2017
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are CDS Auctions Biased and Inefficient?

Abstract: We study the design of credit default swaps (CDS) auctions, which determine the payments by CDS sellers to CDS buyers following defaults of bonds. Using a simple model, we find that the current design of CDS auctions leads to biased prices and inefficient allocations. This is because various restrictions imposed in CDS auctions prevent certain investors from participating in the price discovery and allocation process. The imposition of a price cap or floor also gives dealers large influence on the final auctio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More broadly, our paper relates to a growing literature that investigates the effects of CDS markets on information transmission, risk transfer, and credit market outcomes(Acharya and Johnson (2007),Qiu and Yu (2012),Minton et al (2009),Ashcraft and Santos (2009),Hirtle (2009), and Saretto and Tookes (2013)), as well as a growing theory literature on the uses of CDSs(Duffee and Zhou (2001),Parlour and Plantin (2008),Thompson (2009),Parlour and Winton (2013),Bolton and Oehmke (2011), Zawadowski (2013),Atkeson et al (2015),Che and Sethi (2014),Fostel and Geanakoplos (2012), andOehmke and Zawadowski (2015)). Du and Zhu (2013),Gupta andSundaram (2012), andChernov et al (2013) investigate CDS settlement auctions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More broadly, our paper relates to a growing literature that investigates the effects of CDS markets on information transmission, risk transfer, and credit market outcomes(Acharya and Johnson (2007),Qiu and Yu (2012),Minton et al (2009),Ashcraft and Santos (2009),Hirtle (2009), and Saretto and Tookes (2013)), as well as a growing theory literature on the uses of CDSs(Duffee and Zhou (2001),Parlour and Plantin (2008),Thompson (2009),Parlour and Winton (2013),Bolton and Oehmke (2011), Zawadowski (2013),Atkeson et al (2015),Che and Sethi (2014),Fostel and Geanakoplos (2012), andOehmke and Zawadowski (2015)). Du and Zhu (2013),Gupta andSundaram (2012), andChernov et al (2013) investigate CDS settlement auctions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2009, an auction system has been in place with the purpose of obtaining a postdefault market price that determines the loss in default and that the contract holders have committed to use for cash settlement. Helwege et al (2009) focus on price discovery in these CDS auctions, whereas Chernov, Gorbenko & Makarov (2013); Gupta & Sundaram (2015); and Du & Zhu (2017) all raise concerns about the format of the auctions.…”
Section: The Legal Terms Are Not Trivialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protection seller then pays the difference between the par value and this auction-identified price per unit of the contract notional to the protection buyer. Gupta and Sundaram (2015), Chernov et al (2013), and Du and Zhu (2017) study theoretically and empirically the auction mechanism to determine settlement price.…”
Section: Single-name Cds Contractsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a detailed discussion of the auction mechanism and its efficiency, seeHelwege et al (2009),Gupta and Sundaram (2015),Chernov et al (2013), andDu and Zhu (2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%