2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-015-2657-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Initially Attuned to Object Function Rather Than Shape for Word Learning?

Abstract: We investigate the function bias—generalising words to objects with the same function—in typically developing (TD) children, children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and children with other developmental disorders. Across four trials, a novel object was named and its function was described and demonstrated. Children then selected the other referent from a shape match (same shape, different function) and function match (same function, different shape) object. TD children and children with ASD were ‘function… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the insubstantial evidence gathered to support the categorical view of language delay, findings that identify different learning biases in children with ASD warrant the continued examination of evidence for the dimensional or categorical account of language development (e.g., Field et al 2016;Happé and Booth 2008;Pierce et al 2011). Additionally, previous results from research that solely focused on the acquisition of nouns and verbs motivate us to further examine these two syntactic categories.…”
Section: The Dimensional and The Categorical Account Of Language Devementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Despite the insubstantial evidence gathered to support the categorical view of language delay, findings that identify different learning biases in children with ASD warrant the continued examination of evidence for the dimensional or categorical account of language development (e.g., Field et al 2016;Happé and Booth 2008;Pierce et al 2011). Additionally, previous results from research that solely focused on the acquisition of nouns and verbs motivate us to further examine these two syntactic categories.…”
Section: The Dimensional and The Categorical Account Of Language Devementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The importance of shape as central among perceptual properties of objects is further confirmed by findings of impaired categorisation skills and impaired shape bias in children with autism potentially leading to atypical categorisation and problems with word learning and semantics (Hartley and Allen 2014a;Field et al 2016;Abdelaziz et al 2018). There is also evidence that children with autism are not as successful in categorising objects on the basis of black and white contour sketches in comparison to more realistic colour images of the object (Hartley and Allen 2014b).…”
Section: The Developmental Perspective: Learning Object Labelsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Recent work with young children with ASD with more developed language abilities has demonstrated that, like TD children, they are capable of syntactic bootstrapping within a transitive sentence frame to guide attention in causal scenes (Horvath, McDermott, et al, 2018). Other work in this area suggests that children with ASD may have a greater attentional bias to object function rather than object shape (Field et al, 2016) and that children with ASD may have a reduced shape bias (Potrzeba et al, 2015; Tek et al, 2008). A reduced shape bias may influence object learning (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%