“…Travelers using online applications and crossing boundaries might have to adapt to new privacy regulatory frameworks for privacy protection and information disclosure, which might exacerbate privacy concerns (Tussyadiah et al, 2019). In a recent study, most consumers stated moderately aware of GDPR and their individual rights (Presthus & Sorum, 2018). Since GDPR has priority over the laws of individual states and it can increase perceived control over one's personal data (Presthus & Sorum, 2018;van Ooijen & Vrabec, 2019), it is expected that travelers will feel more protected regarding their information privacy.…”
Section: Macro-environmental Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, most consumers stated moderately aware of GDPR and their individual rights (Presthus & Sorum, 2018). Since GDPR has priority over the laws of individual states and it can increase perceived control over one's personal data (Presthus & Sorum, 2018;van Ooijen & Vrabec, 2019), it is expected that travelers will feel more protected regarding their information privacy. Therefore, the following hypothesis is suggested: H3: Privacy protection regulation perceptions are negatively associated with travelers' online privacy concerns.…”
In light of mounting privacy concerns over the increasing collection and use of biometric and behavioral information for travel facilitation, this study examines travelers' online privacy concerns (TOPC) and its impact on willingness to share data with travel providers. A proposed theoretical model explaining antecedents and outcomes of TOPC related to biometric and behavioral data sharing was tested using structural equation modeling with data collected from 685 travelers. The results extend the Antecedents -Privacy Concerns -Outcomes (APCO) framework by identifying a set of salient individual factors that shape TOPC. The findings provide empirical evidence confirming the context dependence of privacy preferences, showing that although travelers are concerned over their information privacy they are still willing to share their behavioral data; while in the case of biometric information, the disclosure decision is dependent upon expected benefits rather than privacy concerns. This study offers insights into privacy behavior of online consumers in the travel context and constitutes one of the few focusing on the social aspects of biometric authentication.
“…Travelers using online applications and crossing boundaries might have to adapt to new privacy regulatory frameworks for privacy protection and information disclosure, which might exacerbate privacy concerns (Tussyadiah et al, 2019). In a recent study, most consumers stated moderately aware of GDPR and their individual rights (Presthus & Sorum, 2018). Since GDPR has priority over the laws of individual states and it can increase perceived control over one's personal data (Presthus & Sorum, 2018;van Ooijen & Vrabec, 2019), it is expected that travelers will feel more protected regarding their information privacy.…”
Section: Macro-environmental Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, most consumers stated moderately aware of GDPR and their individual rights (Presthus & Sorum, 2018). Since GDPR has priority over the laws of individual states and it can increase perceived control over one's personal data (Presthus & Sorum, 2018;van Ooijen & Vrabec, 2019), it is expected that travelers will feel more protected regarding their information privacy. Therefore, the following hypothesis is suggested: H3: Privacy protection regulation perceptions are negatively associated with travelers' online privacy concerns.…”
In light of mounting privacy concerns over the increasing collection and use of biometric and behavioral information for travel facilitation, this study examines travelers' online privacy concerns (TOPC) and its impact on willingness to share data with travel providers. A proposed theoretical model explaining antecedents and outcomes of TOPC related to biometric and behavioral data sharing was tested using structural equation modeling with data collected from 685 travelers. The results extend the Antecedents -Privacy Concerns -Outcomes (APCO) framework by identifying a set of salient individual factors that shape TOPC. The findings provide empirical evidence confirming the context dependence of privacy preferences, showing that although travelers are concerned over their information privacy they are still willing to share their behavioral data; while in the case of biometric information, the disclosure decision is dependent upon expected benefits rather than privacy concerns. This study offers insights into privacy behavior of online consumers in the travel context and constitutes one of the few focusing on the social aspects of biometric authentication.
“…For our research purposes, we derive ten privacy rights from the GDPR as owners of online personal (Lee et al 2018, p. 77) information (Tikkinen-Piri et al 2018;Presthus and Sørum 2018). Beyond the eight privacy rights specified in the current GDPR guidelines, we add two more rights (Right 9 and 10) that are closely related to the preventive security paradigm of Bright Internet (EUGDPR 2018; Lee et al 2018).…”
The emergence of a preventive cybersecurity paradigm that aims to eliminate the sources of cybercrime threats is becoming an increasingly necessary complement to the current self-defensive cybersecurity systems. One concern associated with adopting such preventive measures is the risk of privacy infringement. Therefore, it is necessary to design the future Internet infrastructure so that it can appropriately balance preventive cybersecurity measures with privacy protections. This research proposes to design the Internet infrastructure using the preventive cybersecurity measures of the Bright Internet, namely preventive cybersecurity protocol and identifiable anonymity protocol, and ten privacy rights derived from Europe's General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR). We then analyze the legitimacy of the five steps of the preventive cybersecurity protocol and the four features of the identifiable anonymity protocol from the perspectives of ten privacy rights. We address the legitimacy from the perspective of potential victims' self-defense rights. Finally, we discuss four potential risks that may occur to the innocent senders and proposed resilient recovery procedures.
“…With regards to "opt in/opt out " provisions, the notification to clients must be clear and exact as to its terms. [6] GDPR requires clear consent and justification. Compliant with the GDPR, the accompanying kinds of information is tended to and secured: [7] i.…”
Section: General Data Protection Regulationmentioning
This study seeks to explore the potentials and limitations of using various Analytical approaches and tools like google analytics, statcounter and web log files to analyze the behavior of online users in the context of content based websites and how Eurpean Union user consent policy has affected this data collection. Using these analytical tools this study will focus on type and amount of data gathered by these tools. The findings are expected to demonstrate useful features of Google Analytics, log files and other visualization tools and extend our understanding of online users. This study will also focus on the design and development of online educational resources and websites for collegiate contexts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.