Are creative individuals bad apples? A dual pathway model of unethical behavior.

Abstract

Research has been inconsistent in its quest to discover whether dispositional creativity is associated with more or less unethical behavior. Drawing on social cognitive theory, we propose that moral disengagement and moral imagination are 2 parallel mechanisms that encourage or inhibit unethical behavior, and that which of these mediation processes occur depends on moral identity. Study 1, a 3-wave study of a food service organization, shows that employees high on both dispositional creativity and moral identity are less likely to be morally disengaged and behave less unethically. The results of Study 2 replicate Study 1's findings in a scenario-based study of college students, and further show that individuals who are high on both dispositional creativity and moral identity are more likely to be morally imaginative and to behave less unethically. Theoretical and practical implications of our model are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Can a firm's environmental innovation attract job seekers? Evidence from experiments

“…By contrast, job seekers with low moral identities may respond more to salaries, benefits, and development prospects in the process of seeking jobs, instead of focusing on social and environmental responsibility. Based on the above analysis, this paper proposes the following hypothesis: At present, many studies continue with Study 2 after conducting Study 1 to verify a hypothesis convincingly (e.g., Duan, Xia, & van Swol, 2018;Keem, Shalley, Kim, & Jeong, 2018;Wang, Owens, Li, & Shi, 2018). Therefore, we will report on two studies that provide supporting evidence for the impact of environmental innovation on a firm's attractiveness, as well as the mediating effect of pride and the moderating effect of moral identity.…”

Are overqualified employees bad apples? A dual-pathway model of cyberloafing

“…Third, moral disengagement can emerge by obscuring or distorting the roles of harmful behaviors, such as ignoring and distorting harmful consequences, displacing and diffusing responsibility. Even though these cognitive mechanisms are discussed separately, previous researches operationalized moral disengagement as a single overarching construct (Chen et al, 2016;Connelly et al, 2016;Keem et al, 2018;Moore et al, 2012).…”

Does Benevolent Leadership Promote Follower Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior? A Social Identity Perspective

“…As prior research has shown that demographic characteristics may influence the extent to which individuals engage in unethical behavior (Kish-Gephart et al, 2010; Keem et al, 2018) and that job tenure may affect the work behavior (Wright & Bonett, 2002), we controlled for the effects of demographic characteristics. Besides the demographics, we included age (in years), gender (1 = male, 2 = female), organizational tenure (in years), and education (1 = high school, 2 = college, 3 = university, 4 = master, 5 = PhD).…”