2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.333403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Depreciations as Contractionary as Devaluations? A Comparison of Selected Emerging and Industrial Economies

Abstract: According to conventional models, flexible exchange rates play an equilibrating role in open economies, depreciating in response to adverse shocks, boosting net exports, and stimulating aggregate demand. However, critics argue that, at least in developing countries, devaluations are more contractionary and more inflationary than conventional theories would predict. Yet, it is not clear whether devaluations per se have led to adverse outcomes, or rather the disruptive abandonments of pegged exchange-rate regime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on 23 OECD countries, Kalyoncu et al (2008) find that real depreciations are contractionary in the long-run in six countries and expansionary in three; and fail to find evidence of a long-run effect on output in the remaining countries. In contrast, Ahmed et al (2002) compare devaluation episodes across a group of developing and industrial economies, where industrial economies are split according to their exchange rate regime. They find that for industrial countries both, devaluations and depreciations, are expansionary, while for developing countries devaluations are contractionary.…”
Section: Expansionary or Contractionary Currency Collapses?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on 23 OECD countries, Kalyoncu et al (2008) find that real depreciations are contractionary in the long-run in six countries and expansionary in three; and fail to find evidence of a long-run effect on output in the remaining countries. In contrast, Ahmed et al (2002) compare devaluation episodes across a group of developing and industrial economies, where industrial economies are split according to their exchange rate regime. They find that for industrial countries both, devaluations and depreciations, are expansionary, while for developing countries devaluations are contractionary.…”
Section: Expansionary or Contractionary Currency Collapses?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions that analyze output developments around the time of a currency crisis in a broad sample of countries are Ahmed et al (2002), Aziz, Caramazza, and Salgado (2000), Barro (2001), Bordo et al (2001), Gupta, Mishra, and Sahay (2000), and Milesi-Ferretti and Razin (2000).…”
Section: Empirical Literature On the Output Costs Of Financial Crisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact stabilizes after 8 months at approximately 0.8% below its base value. Such a finding of the contractionary effect due to devaluation is along the lines of studies by Rajan and Shen [39], Ahmed et al [40], and Bahmani-Oskooee and Miteza [36]. Indeed, Kim and Ying [41] have underlined that devaluation may be more contractionary than previously thought because of financial liberalization and improvement in information technology; devaluation worsens the balance of payments of countries with heavy foreign currency liabilities.…”
Section: Malaysia Andmentioning
confidence: 59%