2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2004.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are domain walls ruled out?

Abstract: Recent analysis of the combined data of cosmic microwave background, galaxy clustering and supernovae type Ia observations have set strong constraints on the equation of state parameter wX . The upper bound wX < −0.82 at 95% c.l. rules out an important class of models, the domain walls (−2/3 < wX < −1/3). Here we revisit the issue of domain walls as a possible alternative to the standard Λ-CDM model by questioning the assumptions made in the choice of priors of the data analysis. The results of our investigati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(43 reference statements)
4
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the condition (4) seems [12] to be inconsistent with the available cosmological evidence, the conclusion to be drawn is that we need a model of a kind more general than a polytropic fluid. Whereas it is hard to see how to construct a viable theoretical model that violates the energy dominance postulate (1), it was pointed out by Bucher and Spergel [14] that it is easy to construct a continuum model that gets round the restriction (4) if, instead of assuming that it behaves as a fluid, one supposes that it will behave as a solid with a sufficiently large rigidity modulus µ. Generalising results that are well known in non-relativistic elasticity theory, it was shown many years ago by the present author [15] that, in a relativistic elastic solid, the speed, c say, of longitudinally polarised propagation modes will be given in terms of the value that it would have according to (2) in the absence of rigidity by…”
Section: The Need For a Solid Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the condition (4) seems [12] to be inconsistent with the available cosmological evidence, the conclusion to be drawn is that we need a model of a kind more general than a polytropic fluid. Whereas it is hard to see how to construct a viable theoretical model that violates the energy dominance postulate (1), it was pointed out by Bucher and Spergel [14] that it is easy to construct a continuum model that gets round the restriction (4) if, instead of assuming that it behaves as a fluid, one supposes that it will behave as a solid with a sufficiently large rigidity modulus µ. Generalising results that are well known in non-relativistic elasticity theory, it was shown many years ago by the present author [15] that, in a relativistic elastic solid, the speed, c say, of longitudinally polarised propagation modes will be given in terms of the value that it would have according to (2) in the absence of rigidity by…”
Section: The Need For a Solid Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The kind of frozen (locally static) rigging system described in the preceding section will provide roughly what seems to be needed [12] to account for the cosmological appearance of dark energy provided the microscopic field theory parameters η and ε are such that the corresponding value of the coefficient c in (14), which according to (21) and (23) will be given by c ≈ |ε| 1/2 η 7/2 ,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, i) in spite of the precise HST result, the Hubble constant value is still controversial [11,12]. ii) We have shown in the previous section that the SN data analysis can only conclude that Ω M < 0.6 (see Fig.…”
Section: Revisited Conclusion On Existing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversi et al [12] provide an interesting critical analysis on the present constraints on cosmological parameters, especially on Ω M , h, and w. Through the study of the degeneracies, they show that the result Ω M = 0.27 ± 0.04 is obtained under the assumption of the ΛCDM model, and provide specific examples with smaller h (h < 0.65) and higher Ω M (Ω M > 0.35) which are in perfect agreement with the most recent CMB and galaxy redshift surveys.…”
Section: Revisited Conclusion On Existing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%