2007
DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfm026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Economists More Likely to Hold Stocks?*

Abstract: A unique data set enables us to test the hypothesis that due to informational advantages economists are more likely to hold stocks than otherwise identical investors. We confirm that economists have a significantly higher probability of participating in the stock market than investors with any other education, even when controlling for several background characteristics. We make use of a large register-based panel data set containing detailed information on the educational attainments and various financial and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4.1), several contributions lacking an observable measure of financial capabilities exploit this evidence and use respondents' demographics in order to capture their financial literacy. Corresponding proxies for financial sophistication used in the literature include (disposable) income and wealth (Dhar and Zhu 2006;Vissing-Jorgensen 2003;Calvet et al 2007Calvet et al , 2009) as well as age (Calvet et al 2007(Calvet et al , 2009Georgarakos and Pasini 2011), educational attainment (Christiansen et al 2008;Calvet et al 2007Calvet et al , 2009), professional status (Calvet et al 2009), and even IQ (Grinblatt et al 2011(Grinblatt et al , 2012. Likewise, both Chalmers and Reuter (2012) and Hackethal et al (2012) use subsets of these demographics to proxy for financial literacy in their analyses.…”
Section: Socio-demographic Proxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.1), several contributions lacking an observable measure of financial capabilities exploit this evidence and use respondents' demographics in order to capture their financial literacy. Corresponding proxies for financial sophistication used in the literature include (disposable) income and wealth (Dhar and Zhu 2006;Vissing-Jorgensen 2003;Calvet et al 2007Calvet et al , 2009) as well as age (Calvet et al 2007(Calvet et al , 2009Georgarakos and Pasini 2011), educational attainment (Christiansen et al 2008;Calvet et al 2007Calvet et al , 2009), professional status (Calvet et al 2009), and even IQ (Grinblatt et al 2011(Grinblatt et al , 2012. Likewise, both Chalmers and Reuter (2012) and Hackethal et al (2012) use subsets of these demographics to proxy for financial literacy in their analyses.…”
Section: Socio-demographic Proxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Households with lower socio-economic status form more pessimistic beliefs about the distribution of stock returns and are less likely to invest in stocks [40]. In addition, change in educational status affects the likelihood of holding stocks and individuals who studied economics are more likely to hold stocks than otherwise identical investors [41]. Genetic factors are also considered in assimilating stock market participation.…”
Section: Stock Market Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly large fraction of households not invests in stocks and this limited participation of households in stock markets is quite puzzling (Christiansen and Rangvid, 2008). It is very puzzling that large portion of U.S. households holds very few or no stocks (Guo, 2001).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age has significant impact on stock market participation (Bogan, 2008;Christiansen and Rangvid, 2008;Guiso et al, 2003;Hong et al, 2004;Rooij et al, 2007). Stock market participation increases with age and more among those who are 40 or older (Alessieet al, 2004).…”
Section: Age and Stockholdingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation