Are environmental characteristics in the municipal eldercare, more closely associated with frequent short sick leave spells among employees than with total sick leave: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

BackgroundIt has been suggested that frequent-, short-term sick leave is associated with work environment factors, whereas long-term sick leave is associated mainly with health factors. However, studies of the hypothesis of an association between a poor working environment and frequent short spells of sick leave are few and results are inconsistent. Therefore, we aimed to explore associations between self-reported psychosocial work factors and workplace-registered frequency and length of sick leave in the eldercare sector.MethodsEmployees from the municipal eldercare in Aarhus (N = 2,534) were included. In 2005, they responded to a work environment questionnaire. Sick leave records from 2005 were dichotomised into total sick leave days (0–14 and above 14 days) and into spell patterns (0–2 short, 3–9 short, and mixed spells and 1–3 long spells). Logistic regression models were used to analyse associations; adjusted for age, gender, occupation, and number of spells or sick leave length.ResultsThe response rate was 76%; 96% of the respondents were women. Unfavourable mean scores in work pace, demands for hiding emotions, poor quality of leadership and bullying were best indicated by more than 14 sick leave days compared with 0–14 sick leave days. For work pace, the best indicator was a long-term sick leave pattern compared with a non-frequent short-term pattern. A frequent short-term sick leave pattern was a better indicator of emotional demands (1.62; 95% CI: 1.1-2.5) and role conflict (1.50; 95% CI: 1.2-1.9) than a short-term non-frequent pattern.Age (= < 40 / >40 years) statistically significantly modified the association between the 1–3 long-term sick leave spell pattern and commitment to the workplace compared with the 3–9 frequent short-term pattern.ConclusionsTotal sick leave length and a long-term sick leave spell pattern were just as good or even better indicators of unfavourable work factor scores than a frequent short-term sick leave pattern. Scores in commitment to the workplace and quality of leadership varied with sick leave pattern and age. Thus, different sick leave measures seem to be associated with different work environment factors. Further studies on these associations may inform interventions to improve occupational health care.

Joint association of sleep problems and psychosocial working conditions with registered long-term sickness absence. A Danish cohort study

“…We included only sickness absence of >3 weeks duration and had no information regarding the cause of the absence. Thus our results may not generalize to sickness absence of shorter duration, which may have other mechanisms (62,63). We also do not know if the examined associations vary in relation to the cause of absence.…”

Cross-National Validation of Prognostic Models Predicting Sickness Absence and the Added Value of Work Environment Variables

“…Unfortunately, Munir and colleagues did not investigate the frequency of SA episodes. Stapelfeldt et al [29] found that the COPSOQ leadership quality scale was cross-sectionally associated with the frequency of long (C15 days) SA episodes. This corroborates our finding that leadership quality improved discrimination by both the SA days and SA episodes model.…”

Effect of a participatory organizational-level occupational health intervention on short-term sickness absence: a cluster randomized controlled trial

“…We assume that an intervention focusing on the core task at work will reduce unreasonable and unnecessary tasks, which subsequently will reduce employees' stress level leading to a lower incidence of short-term sickness absence. It has been suggested that short-term sickness absence may partly be a reaction, either health-or coping-based or both, to a problematic psychosocial work environment (17)(18)(19). Long-term sickness absence, on the other hand, may more often be related to severe diseases (20).…”