Are ethical explanations explanatory? Meta-ethical beliefs shape judgments about explanations for social change

Lewry, Casey; Tsai, George; Lombrozo, Tania

doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105860

Cognition

2024

DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105860

|View full text |Cite

Are ethical explanations explanatory? Meta-ethical beliefs shape judgments about explanations for social change

Casey Lewry,

George Tsai,

Tania Lombrozo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Lay Theories of Moral Progress

Lewry,

Asifriyaz,

Lombrozo

2024

Cognitive Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many consider the world to be morally better today than it was in the past and expect moral improvement to continue. How do people explain what drives this change? In this paper, we identify two ways people might think about how moral progress occurs: that it is driven by human action (i.e., if people did not actively work to make the world better, moral progress would not occur) or that it is driven by an unspecified mechanism (i.e., that our world is destined to morally improve, but without specifying a role for human action). In Study 1 (N = 147), we find that those who more strongly believe that the mechanism of moral progress is human action are more likely to believe their own intervention is warranted to correct a moral setback. In Study 2 (N = 145), we find that this translates to intended action: those who more strongly believe moral progress is driven by human action report that they would donate more money to correct a moral setback. In Study 3 (N = 297), participants generate their own explanations for why moral progress occurs. We find that participants’ donation intentions are predicted by whether their explanations state that human action drives moral progress. Together, these studies suggest that beliefs about the mechanisms of moral progress have important implications for engaging in social action.

show abstract

Lay Theories of Moral Progress

Lewry,

Asifriyaz,

Lombrozo

2024

Cognitive Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Are ethical explanations explanatory? Meta-ethical beliefs shape judgments about explanations for social change

Cited by 1 publication

References 37 publications

Lay Theories of Moral Progress

Lay Theories of Moral Progress

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About