2019
DOI: 10.1167/19.14.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are expression aftereffects fully explained by tilt adaptation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the insula, as part of the salience network, is important for the rapid detection of personally relevant or otherwise significant emotional cues in the environment [ 75 , 76 , 77 ]. Our findings showing the involvement of brain regions subserving emotional processing are consistent with previous findings that emotional adaptation aftereffects were associated with high-level emotional processing [ 22 , 30 , 31 , 54 , 78 ] and that the magnitude of emotional adaptation aftereffects was positively correlated with the emotional intensity of the adapting faces [ 19 , 27 , 30 , 79 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the insula, as part of the salience network, is important for the rapid detection of personally relevant or otherwise significant emotional cues in the environment [ 75 , 76 , 77 ]. Our findings showing the involvement of brain regions subserving emotional processing are consistent with previous findings that emotional adaptation aftereffects were associated with high-level emotional processing [ 22 , 30 , 31 , 54 , 78 ] and that the magnitude of emotional adaptation aftereffects was positively correlated with the emotional intensity of the adapting faces [ 19 , 27 , 30 , 79 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The key assignment was counterbalanced among participants throughout the experiment. Participants were instructed to fixate on a white cross in the center of the black screen to eliminate the effects of fixation differences [ 30 , 54 ]. For each trial, the response time was a random jitter (i.e., fixation) lasting between 2.3 and 5.3 s (mean = 4.3 s) to enhance the design efficiency [ 55 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%