2019
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Face-Incongruent Voices Harder to Process?

Abstract: Abstract. Based on current integration theories of face–voice processing, the present study had participants process 1,152 videos of faces uttering digits. Half of the videos contained face–voice gender-incongruent stimuli (vs. congruent stimuli in the other half). Participants indicated digit magnitude or parity. Tasks were presented in pure blocks (only 1 task) and in task switching blocks (using colored cues to specify task). The results indicate significant congruency effects in pure blocks, but partially … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presumably, this type of conflicting information is more detrimental for naturally co‐occurring stimuli such as faces and voices than for abstract stimuli. Independent of the emotional category of the voice, responses were slower for gender‐mismatching than ‐matching face‐voice pairs, replicating previous findings (Huestegge et al, 2019; Latinus et al, 2010). Gender‐mismatching information might be more difficult to integrate due to the long‐term and repeated strengthening of the associations of gender‐congruent faces and voices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Presumably, this type of conflicting information is more detrimental for naturally co‐occurring stimuli such as faces and voices than for abstract stimuli. Independent of the emotional category of the voice, responses were slower for gender‐mismatching than ‐matching face‐voice pairs, replicating previous findings (Huestegge et al, 2019; Latinus et al, 2010). Gender‐mismatching information might be more difficult to integrate due to the long‐term and repeated strengthening of the associations of gender‐congruent faces and voices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Presumably, this type of conflicting information is more detrimental for naturally co-occurring stimuli such as faces and voices than for abstract stimuli. Independent of the emotional category of the voice, responses were slower for gender-mismatching than -matching face-voice pairs, replicating previous findings (Huestegge, Raettig, & Huestegge, 2019;Latinus, VanRullen, & Taylor, 2010). Gender-mismatching 10 information might be more difficult to integrate due to the long-term and repeated strengthening of the associations of gender-congruent faces and voices.…”
Section: Emotion and Congruence Effects Of Face-voice Pairssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In the following, one final potential limitation of the present study should be discussed in more detail. Specifically, one might argue that the present procedure (simultaneous presentation of two visual static/dynamic stimuli along with auditory speech) might represent an a priori disadvantage for the dynamic condition due to potential interference phenomena (see Huestegge and Raettig, 2019; Huestegge et al, 2019, for underlying cognitive mechanisms of such interference phenomena). In particular, different text material was used for the two input channels in the dynamic condition, resulting in an audio-visual mismatch between the lip movements of the actors and the auditory text (i.e., seen and heard speech).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%