“…As such, there already exists a significant body of literature on the question of whether television broadcasts serve as a substitute for stadium attendance (e.g., S. Allan, 2004; Baimbridge et al, 1996; Barajas et al, 2019; Kringstad et al, 2018; Nielsen et al, 2019), whether promotions such as bobblehead giveaways, fireworks, and even marching bands, are effective in increasing stadium attendance demand (e.g., Boyd & Krehbiel, 2003; Kappe et al, 2014; McDonald & Rascher, 2000; Natke & Thomas, 2019; Paul et al, 2013), and whether consumer preferences alter in the aftermath of exogenous shocks as diverse as a corruption scandal (Buraimo et al, 2016), an influenza virus outbreak (Gitter, 2017), college football player protests (Watanabe et al, 2019), increasing terror alert levels (Kalist, 2010), or the announcement of performance-enhancing drug violations (Cisyk & Courty, 2017). Interestingly, though frequently included as control variables, only a few authors have centered their study on the potential effects of match fixtures/scheduling (Goller & Krumer, 2020; Krumer, 2020; Paul et al, 2004) or both environmental effects and the weather (e.g., Cairns, 1984; Ge et al, 2020; Ito et al, 2016). Among the latter, Watanabe et al (2019), for instance, explored the potential role of air pollution in shaping stadium attendance demand in the Chinese Super League, thus paving an interesting new way towards a better understanding of how spectators respond to potential health threats on matchday – a theme that will certainly gain more importance in the future (e.g., Reade et al, 2020b).…”