Are financial incentives more effective than health campaigns to quit smoking? A community-randomised smoking cessation trial in Denmark

Pisinger, Charlotta; Toxværd, Cecilie Goltermann; Rasmussen, Mette

doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106865

Cited by 4 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2019, a Cochrane review identified 33 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of financial incentives [ 3 ]. Since then, several other RCTs have confirmed that incentives are an efficient, cheap, and safe method to improve quit rates [ 4 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Results from several studies indicate that offering small financial incentives for smoking abstinence are also efficient in disadvantaged persons [ 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For details, please see Pisinger et al (“Are financial incentives more effective than health campaigns to quit smoking? A community-randomized smoking cessation trial in Denmark”) [ 4 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In another municipality, all smoking cessation activities were stopped after approximately eight months due to a local political decision. For details, please see [ 4 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our research group tested the use of financial incentives for smoking cessation in a community-randomized trial, “Richer without smoking”, taking part in six Danish municipalities in 2018 [ 4 ]. This study showed no difference between financial incentives and professional campaigns regarding recruitment of smokers to a smoking cessation program, but financial incentives had significantly greater effect in terms of helping smokers remain smokefree for a year.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The aim of this paper was to investigate if smokers with low SES included in the “Richer without smoking” study [ 4 ] in municipalities who offered financial incentives (FIMs) achieved higher levels of abstinence compared to smokers with low SES in municipalities who used the resources on smoking cessation campaigns (CAMs). The same was investigated for smokers with high SES.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Smoking Cessation Programs Are Less Effective in Smokers with Low Socioeconomic Status Even When Financial Incentives for Quitting Smoking Are Offered—A Community-Randomized Smoking Cessation Trial in Denmark

Pisinger

Toxværd

Rasmussen

2022

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Financial incentives offered to those who quit smoking have been found effective, also in persons with low socioeconomic status (SES), but no previous study has investigated who benefits most: smokers with low or high SES. In this community-randomized trial (“Richer without smoking”), three Danish municipalities were randomized to reward persons who were abstinent when attending the municipal smoking cessation program (FIMs) and three municipalities were randomized to spend the same amount on smoking cessation campaigns recruiting smokers to the smoking cessation program (CAMs). The municipalities each received approximately USD 16,000. An intention-to-treat approach was used in analyses. In regression analyses adjusted for individual- and municipal-level differences, we found that smokers with high SES living in FIMs had significantly higher proportion of validated long-term successful quitters (OR (95% CI): 2.59 (1.6–4.2)) than high-SES smokers living in CAM. Smokers with low SES, however, did not experience the same benefit of financial incentives as smokers with high SES. Neither the FIMs nor the CAMs succeeded in attracting more smokers with low SES during the intervention year 2018 than the year before. Our study showed that smokers with low SES did not experience the same benefit of financial incentives as smokers with high SES.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In another municipality, all smoking cessation activities were stopped after approximately eight months due to a local political decision. For details, please see [ 4 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Smoking Cessation Programs Are Less Effective in Smokers with Low Socioeconomic Status Even When Financial Incentives for Quitting Smoking Are Offered—A Community-Randomized Smoking Cessation Trial in Denmark

Pisinger

Toxværd

Rasmussen

2022

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The contribution of Dutch municipalities to stimulate smoke-free outdoor sports clubs: a qualitative study

Smit,

Rozema,

van de Goor

et al. 2024

Health Promotion International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Local governments may play a key role in making outdoor sports clubs smoke free. This study aims to assess the activities, motives, challenges and strategies of Dutch municipalities regarding stimulating outdoor sports clubs to become smoke free. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 policy officers of different municipalities in the Netherlands. The included municipalities varied in terms of region, population size and degree of urbanization. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Municipalities stimulated sports clubs to become smoke free by providing information and support and, to a lesser extent, by using financial incentives. Motives of municipalities varied from facilitating a healthy living environment for youth, responding to denormalization of smoking and aligning with goals formulated in national prevention policy. Policy officers faced several challenges, including limited capacity and funds, a reluctance to interfere with sports clubs and little support within the municipal organization. These challenges were addressed by employing various strategies such as embedding smoke-free sports in a broader preventive policy, setting a good example by creating outdoor smoke-free areas around municipal buildings, and collaborating with stakeholders in the municipality to join forces in realizing smoke-free sports clubs. Municipalities demonstrated evident motivation to contribute to a smoke-free sports environment. Currently, most municipalities fulfil an informative and supportive role, while some municipalities still explore their role and position in relation to supporting sports clubs to become smoke free. Other municipalities have established, according to them, effective strategies.

show abstract

How and why do financial incentives contribute to helping people stop smoking? A realist review

Siersbaek,

Kavanagh,

Ford

et al. 2024

BMC Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Tobacco smoking remains a key cause of preventable illness and death globally. In response, many countries provide extensive services to help people to stop smoking by offering a variety of effective behavioural and pharmacological therapies. However, many people who wish to stop smoking do not have access to or use stop smoking supports, and new modes of support, including the use of financial incentives, are needed to address this issue. A realist review of published international literature was undertaken to understand how, why, for whom, and in which circumstances financial incentives contribute to success in stopping smoking for general population groups and among pregnant women. Methods Systematic searches were undertaken from inception to February 2022 of five academic databases: MEDLINE (ovid), Embase.com, CIHAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO. Study selection was inclusive of all study designs. Twenty-two studies were included. Using Pawson and Tilley’s iterative realist review approach, data collected were screened, selected, coded, analysed, and synthesised into a set of explanatory theoretical findings. Results Data were synthesised into six Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations and one overarching programme theory after iterative rounds of analysis, team discussion, and expert panel feedback. Our programme theory shows that financial incentives are particularly useful to help people stop smoking if they have a financial need, are pregnant or recently post-partum, have a high threshold for behaviour change, and/or respond well to external rewards. The incentives work through a number of mechanisms including the role their direct monetary value can play in a person’s life and through a process of reinforcement where they can help build confidence and self-esteem. Conclusion This is the first realist review to synthesise how, why, and for whom financial incentives work among those attempting to stop smoking, adding to the existing evidence demonstrating their efficacy. The findings will support the implementation of current knowledge into effective programmes which can enhance the impact of stop smoking care. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022298941.

show abstract

Are financial incentives more effective than health campaigns to quit smoking? A community-randomised smoking cessation trial in Denmark

Cited by 4 publications

References 38 publications

Smoking Cessation Programs Are Less Effective in Smokers with Low Socioeconomic Status Even When Financial Incentives for Quitting Smoking Are Offered—A Community-Randomized Smoking Cessation Trial in Denmark

Smoking Cessation Programs Are Less Effective in Smokers with Low Socioeconomic Status Even When Financial Incentives for Quitting Smoking Are Offered—A Community-Randomized Smoking Cessation Trial in Denmark

The contribution of Dutch municipalities to stimulate smoke-free outdoor sports clubs: a qualitative study

How and why do financial incentives contribute to helping people stop smoking? A realist review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About