2018
DOI: 10.1111/auar.12254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Financial Reports Useful? The Views of New Zealand Public Versus Private Users

Abstract: This study reports on surveys conducted with users of financial reports in New Zealand. We compare findings for users of reports of two types of for‐profit entities, namely those with public accountability (public entities) and those with no public accountability (private entities). The findings indicate that both types of users have similar perceptions regarding the usefulness of financial statements, with the income statement and balance sheet rated as the most useful components. Furthermore, both types of u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, the information needs are thus quite different. Prior studies (Barth et al, 2008;Cascino et al, 2014;Ehalaiye et al, 2018;Kothari et al, 2010) concur and provide empirical evidence on the varying information needs of investors and lenders. More specifically, information used and deemed useful can be significantly different for the two user groups, which has been shown when the groups have been analysed individually (Chenhall and Juchau, 1977;Epstein, 1975), comparatively (Benjamin and Stanga, 1977), and jointly (Abu-Nassar and Rutherford, 1996;Abdelkarim et al, 2009;Alattar and Al-Khater, 2008;Chatterjee et al, 2010;De Zoysa and Rudkin, 2010;Mirshekary and Saudagaran, 2005;Naser et al, 2003).…”
Section: The Usefulness Of Ifrscompliant Reports 525mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Arguably, the information needs are thus quite different. Prior studies (Barth et al, 2008;Cascino et al, 2014;Ehalaiye et al, 2018;Kothari et al, 2010) concur and provide empirical evidence on the varying information needs of investors and lenders. More specifically, information used and deemed useful can be significantly different for the two user groups, which has been shown when the groups have been analysed individually (Chenhall and Juchau, 1977;Epstein, 1975), comparatively (Benjamin and Stanga, 1977), and jointly (Abu-Nassar and Rutherford, 1996;Abdelkarim et al, 2009;Alattar and Al-Khater, 2008;Chatterjee et al, 2010;De Zoysa and Rudkin, 2010;Mirshekary and Saudagaran, 2005;Naser et al, 2003).…”
Section: The Usefulness Of Ifrscompliant Reports 525mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Concerning respondents' perception of different types of information, preparers considered annual reports as the most useful source of information, whereas users preferred the preliminary announcement made by companies They then identify different decision roles of user groups such as investment decisions for individual investors, teaching-and research-related purposes for academics, advisory statements for stockbrokers and granting and monitoring loans for loan officers. Third, we find comparative studies (Table 1, section C) between two specific groups in the domain of usefulness of financial reporting (Dawd et al, 2018;Ehalaiye et al, 2018;Stainbank and Peebles, 2006).…”
Section: Survey Users (72) (Managers Of Equity Unit Trusts To Represent Investors) and Preparers (Financial Managers In Companies)mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The report (Laswad et al 2017) and XRB summary (XRB 2017c) were completed in December 2017. Combined information from these reports was published as Ehalaiye et al (2020).…”
Section: Publications and Citationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining two papers are related to the theme of information usefulness. Ehalaiye et al (2020) report the findings of two studies undertaken for the New Zealand External Reporting Board on the perceived usefulness of financial reports. Users were asked about the usefulness of specific financial statements, supplementary reports and other information sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%