2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are frontline employees punching bags? The relationship between interpersonal workplace incivility and employee incivility toward customers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As CI is one of the work affective events that cause emotional drain of employees, employees may make use of coping methods to handle the stress experienced. Surface acting (SA) is one type of coping method, in which employees disengage themselves to cope with the emotional strain from CI (Chen, Wang, & Shih, 2021; Tillman, Gonzalez, Whitman, Crawford, & Hood, 2018) and also to avoid further problems from the uncivilized customers (Hunter & Penney, 2014). Besides employees are actively using SA as an individual coping strategy to deal with CI, organizations also require employees to suppress their emotions or perform SA while interacting with customers (Ben-Zur & Yagil, 2005), believing that it can prompt better service and customer satisfaction (Kim & Yoon, 2012), even when customers behave in an uncivil manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As CI is one of the work affective events that cause emotional drain of employees, employees may make use of coping methods to handle the stress experienced. Surface acting (SA) is one type of coping method, in which employees disengage themselves to cope with the emotional strain from CI (Chen, Wang, & Shih, 2021; Tillman, Gonzalez, Whitman, Crawford, & Hood, 2018) and also to avoid further problems from the uncivilized customers (Hunter & Penney, 2014). Besides employees are actively using SA as an individual coping strategy to deal with CI, organizations also require employees to suppress their emotions or perform SA while interacting with customers (Ben-Zur & Yagil, 2005), believing that it can prompt better service and customer satisfaction (Kim & Yoon, 2012), even when customers behave in an uncivil manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unsure whether the effect of coworker service sabotage would remain the same if other forms of coworker behaviors were also included. For instance, as coworker incivility and workplace ostracism are prevalent in hospitality organizations (Chen et al , 2021; Zhu et al , 2017), future research might take these two types of coworker behaviors into account and control their effects when examining the impact of coworker service sabotage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its low intensity, according to Andersson and Pearson (1999), incivility can spiral into progressively extreme violent behaviors. While much attention has been focused on elevated types of workplace mistreatment, organizational scholars have begun to gather evidence for the unique and harmful effects of workplace incivility (Alola, Avcı, & Öztüren, 2021;Chen, Wang, & Shih, 2021;Guo, Qiu, & Gan, 2020;He, Walker, Payne, & Miner, 2021;Itzkovich, Dolev, & Shnapper-Cohen, 2020;Liu, Xiao, He, Wang, & Li, 2020;Mehmood et al, 2021;Namin, Øgaard, & Røislien, 2021;Samad, Memon, & Kumar, 2020;Sharma & Mishra, 2021;Vasconcelos, 2020). The fact that incivility can "spiral" towards more severe and aggressive actions (Andersson & Pearson, 1999) highlights the need to further understand this concept (Zhou, Meier, & Spector, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%