2015
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0780-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are icons sense data?

Abstract: We argue that Hoffman, Singh, and Prakash (Psychon Bull Rev, this issue) have not made the case that "the language of space-time and physical objects is the wrong language for describing the true structure of the objective world." Further, we contend that, contrary to what Hoffman et al. claim, the perceptual icons posited by interface theory seem best taken to be sense data.Keywords The interface theory of perception . Sense datum theory As Hoffman, Singh, and Prakash (2014) (1999, 6) Like Hoffman, Singh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our goal in the present paper is not to review this entire (large, multidimensional) debate (see also Angelucci, Fano, Ferretti, Macrelli, & Tarozzi, 2021; Feldman, 2015; Fields, 2015; Koenderink, 2015; Martinez, 2019; Mausfeld, 2015; McLaughlin & Green, 2015; O'Connor, 2014; Schlesinger, 2015; Wilson, 2021), however, and we will largely refrain from weighing in on these many previous critiques and subsequent defenses. Instead, we aim to contribute something new to this discussion, by presenting some key considerations concerning our “cognitive architecture” that pose a stark challenge to ITP (and support the intuitive notion of veridical perception)—but that to our knowledge have not previously been considered in past discussions (by either ITP's proponents or detractors).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal in the present paper is not to review this entire (large, multidimensional) debate (see also Angelucci, Fano, Ferretti, Macrelli, & Tarozzi, 2021; Feldman, 2015; Fields, 2015; Koenderink, 2015; Martinez, 2019; Mausfeld, 2015; McLaughlin & Green, 2015; O'Connor, 2014; Schlesinger, 2015; Wilson, 2021), however, and we will largely refrain from weighing in on these many previous critiques and subsequent defenses. Instead, we aim to contribute something new to this discussion, by presenting some key considerations concerning our “cognitive architecture” that pose a stark challenge to ITP (and support the intuitive notion of veridical perception)—but that to our knowledge have not previously been considered in past discussions (by either ITP's proponents or detractors).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are better understood as versions of a sensedatum view on which the inferential process yields an image which in turn represents external reality. For a rather different empirical defence of a sense-datum type view seeHoffman et al, 2015, and for commentary, McLaughlin andGreen, 2015. 7 Hume's brief argument is closest to an argument from illusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%