2015
DOI: 10.1080/1536710x.2015.989560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Individuals With Disabilities and Their Families “Resilient”? Deconstructing and Recasting a Well-Intended Concept

Abstract: This article contributes to existing scholarship related to resilience in families with members with disabilities by first using a disability studies orientation to "unbound" existing definitions of resilience, then by providing empirical illustration of this unbounding. Using family as our unit of analysis, we present data from 3 families who navigate successes and challenges related to disability. Three themes of honoring relationships, family member expertise, and standing in one's power emerged. We suggest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, a more critical discussion on antecedents (adversities) and consequences (positive adaptation) of resiliency unique to paediatric rehabilitation clients is of value to researchers and practitioners. In line with critical scholarship (Gibson, 2016;Hutcheon & Lashewicz, 2015), we argue for an alternative definition of resiliency beyond the normative notion of competency, ability and skills, which accounts for clients' capacity to navigate through disabling environments. Such a definition, when adequately operationalized, should allow rehabilitation researchers and practitioners to capture clients' rich and fluid strengths and resourcefulness.…”
Section: Limitations and Recommendations For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Additionally, a more critical discussion on antecedents (adversities) and consequences (positive adaptation) of resiliency unique to paediatric rehabilitation clients is of value to researchers and practitioners. In line with critical scholarship (Gibson, 2016;Hutcheon & Lashewicz, 2015), we argue for an alternative definition of resiliency beyond the normative notion of competency, ability and skills, which accounts for clients' capacity to navigate through disabling environments. Such a definition, when adequately operationalized, should allow rehabilitation researchers and practitioners to capture clients' rich and fluid strengths and resourcefulness.…”
Section: Limitations and Recommendations For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Qualitative studies provide a way of discovering construction of positive meaning and novel resources contributing to resilience. 16,19…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Qualitative research suggests that resilience can be understood as the family’s attempt to generate positive meaning of the caring experience. 19 For the purpose of this review the research question was defined as “What is the current understanding of resilience in those who care for someone with DMD?”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les recherches s'intéressant à la résilience des familles de personnes en situation de handicap abordent souvent celle-ci dans une perspective normative, postulant qu'il existe des familles « résilientes » et des familles « non résilientes » sur la base de compétences et de situations prédéfinies (Breitkreuz et al, 2014 ;Hutcheon & Lashewicz, 2015 ;McConnell & Savage, 2015). Or, comme le souligne , il est nécessaire de se départir de tout cadre normatif, en particulier lorsque l'on s'intéresse à des familles issues de milieux socio-culturels diversifiés.…”
Section: Problématiqueunclassified