Are Intellectual Property Rights Hindering Technological Advance? The Need for Technological Commons<sup>1</sup>

Rouvinen, Petri; Stankiewicz, Rikard

doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00375.x

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…15 15 The need to rely on IPR has led to an increased broadening of the “patentable” scope to both software in business processes. This in turn may cause a significant hindrance to continuous innovation, and as such is a strong example of the power of the new politics of regulation in the era of the service transformation (Rouvinen & Stankiewicz, 2009). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Services Transformation and Network Policy: The New Logic of Value Creation¹

Kushida

Zysman

2009

Review of Policy Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Services Transformation and Network Policy: The New Logic of Value Creation¹

Kushida

Zysman

2009

Review of Policy Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Table 2. Enterprise Accepting IP ownership [14,15,42,44] Asset recovery processes [46] Creation of communities of practices; culture of learning [20,29] Adopting KM processes [40] Knowledge contributions; business intelligence [28,36] Measuring IP and Knowledge value [5,6,21,28,30,31,33] Knowledge-Management governance [9,12,18,26,31] Patent law/regulations [4,5,11,27,32,35,41,45] The number of articles identified within the second category provided an indication of the need to make a connection between the overall management of knowledge within the organization and the ownership of intellectual property. Table 3 provides a look at the areas which are associated with the infrastructure within the organization such as data storage, collaboration systems, security concerns, and technology-based intellectual property.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 3. Infrastructure Single data repositories/storage areas [14,35] Computer-supported collaboration; knowledge transfer processes [22,29] Knowledge managers [28] Security, encryption, watermarking, forensics, content-awareness [2,7,10,13,37,39] IT Intellectual Property [44] Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences -2011…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge, Intellectual Capital, and Protection: A Literature Review

Little

2011

2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This literature review will examine the connection between knowledge management and KM systems with organizational intellectual capital and property. Organizations are collecting, storing, and manipulating knowledge to accomplish their assigned tasks on a daily basis. Organizations can also examine this knowledge as being intellectual capital. This paper reviews the concepts of knowledge serving as intellectual capital, security and approaches toward estimating the value of the capital, and provides a perspective of the current literature. Through the analysis, common themes were identified across three categories including Cultural, Enterprise, and Information Infrastructure which contribute to the understanding of how knowledge management systems impact organizational structures. Further studies are needed to provide guidance on identifying which knowledge can be established as intellectual capital and how to estimate value of such knowledge.

show abstract

“…Institutions need to be strengthened through approaches such as technology transfer programs and the diffusion of new technologies in LDCs. This is relevant to the current system of patents and trademarks, which are meant to be an incentive to innovate, but have become a hindrance to global diffusion of new technologies and are often abused to ensure a monopolistic market environment (Rouvinen and Stankiewicz 2009). Similarly, the international tax system is meant to create an even playing field for all countries but in many ways has turned into a "race to the bottom'" with the creation and abuse of numerous tax loopholes.…”

Section: Recommendationmentioning

confidence: 99%

New Analysis Tools and Leadership Model for A Modern UN

Bienz

Schismenos

Stevens

et al. 2020

JSPG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digitalization has disrupted the way products are distributed. With this came an influx of products that depend on network effects and thrive in a winner-takes-all market environment (Schilling 2002). A similar trend is being observed in many frontier technologies, including applications in the so-called ‘gig economy’, which will create winners and losers. Simultaneously, governments are experiencing an erosion of their tax base (Peng 2016). These resources are desperately needed to tackle the widening digital divide, combatting the lack of electricity, and providing internet access to the poorest (International Energy Agency 2017). The current strategy of the United Nations (UN) shows promise. However, the way the UN currently operates has not been adapted to meet the challenges of a digital economy. This is often observed in global-to-local applications, especially when generalized frameworks fail to adapt to communities with different characteristics and needs. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a guiding light to rally stakeholders around specific key issues and opens the field for collaboration. The UN is in a unique position to convince all participants to engage in negotiations, to mobilize substantial resources, and has the best chance to get concessions on restrictive systems such as the intellectual property arrangements (Haugen 2010). Systems need to be in place to facilitate technology transfers and capacities need to be built up to give the least developed countries (LDCs) a chance of catching up. The UN needs to bring international institutions, governments, civil society, academia, and the private sector to the table to enable LDCs to determine their own future (Moyo 2010). The UN should introduce more heuristic analysis tools to bring more diverse partners into workable collaborations to address these challenges. A new leadership system should also be introduced to provide clearer direction and autonomy to their contributors.

show abstract

Are Intellectual Property Rights Hindering Technological Advance? The Need for Technological Commons¹

Abstract: In the last quarter century, the scope of patenting has been expanded, the requirements

Cited by 4 publications

References 42 publications

The Services Transformation and Network Policy: The New Logic of Value Creation¹

The Services Transformation and Network Policy: The New Logic of Value Creation¹

Knowledge, Intellectual Capital, and Protection: A Literature Review

New Analysis Tools and Leadership Model for A Modern UN

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Are Intellectual Property Rights Hindering Technological Advance? The Need for Technological Commons1

Abstract: In the last quarter century, the scope of patenting has been expanded, the requirements

Cited by 4 publications

References 42 publications

The Services Transformation and Network Policy: The New Logic of Value Creation1

The Services Transformation and Network Policy: The New Logic of Value Creation1

Knowledge, Intellectual Capital, and Protection: A Literature Review

New Analysis Tools and Leadership Model for A Modern UN

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Are Intellectual Property Rights Hindering Technological Advance? The Need for Technological Commons¹

The Services Transformation and Network Policy: The New Logic of Value Creation¹

The Services Transformation and Network Policy: The New Logic of Value Creation¹