2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2013.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Islamic bonds different from conventional bonds? International evidence from capital market tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
86
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
86
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…() each analyzes and discusses the reasons for and the backdrop of Sukuk market development, but they do not conduct micro‐level empirical analyses. To the best of our knowledge, only Afshar (), Godlewski et al (), Alam et al () and Hassan () empirically studied the Sukuk market. Godlewski et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() each analyzes and discusses the reasons for and the backdrop of Sukuk market development, but they do not conduct micro‐level empirical analyses. To the best of our knowledge, only Afshar (), Godlewski et al (), Alam et al () and Hassan () empirically studied the Sukuk market. Godlewski et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() and Alam et al . () use event study approaches to examine investor reaction to Sukuk issuance – they both find evidence of negative market reaction suggesting that investors do not view such activities in a positive light. Finally, Bialkowski et al .…”
Section: Islamic Financementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other papers noticed a varied reaction in the capitalisation of Malaysian listed companies to information on the issuance of conventional bonds and sukuk. However, in one instance the investors' reaction to sukuk issues was negative (Godlewski et al, 2010;Alam et al, 2013), while other results indicated that investors reacted positively to the announcement of Islamic debt issues (Ibrahim and Minai, 2009). In turn, a study analysing the effectiveness of portfolios composed of Eurobonds and sukuk of the same issuers based in Malaysia, Pakistan, Qatar and Bahrain detected material differences in the behaviour of the two instruments (Cakir and Raei, 2007).…”
Section: The Nature Of Sukuk -Theoretical and Empirical Approachmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They consider not only the direct issuance costs, which are usually higher than in the case of conventional bonds, but also barriers to demand resulting from a small investor base, and the distinctness and considerable complexity of the construction of those Islamic instruments. One of the factors which should also be borne in mind is the potential negative effect of the announcement of a sukuk issuance on company value (Alam, Hassan, and Haque, 2013).…”
Section: Barriers and Challenges For The Participants Of The Europeanmentioning
confidence: 99%