2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07390-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are lesion features reproducible between 18F-FDG PET/CT images when acquired on analog or digital PET/CT scanners?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of new PET/CT scanners and technical features could influence the choice of the best SUVmax threshold to detect RT and this topic needs to be better analyzed, especially in the future with the increased availability of digital PET/CT scanners [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of new PET/CT scanners and technical features could influence the choice of the best SUVmax threshold to detect RT and this topic needs to be better analyzed, especially in the future with the increased availability of digital PET/CT scanners [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the introduction of digital PET machines has resulted in increased sensitivity with a relative increased FDG uptake as compared to analog systems. In a recent prospective single-center study, Constantino et al (16) showed higher lesion SUVs with digital systems in a head-to-head comparison with analog systems. However, when they applied specific protocols' reconstructions, the relative difference was minimized between analog and digital PET system (16).…”
Section: Variants Artifacts and Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a recent prospective single-center study, Constantino et al (16) showed higher lesion SUVs with digital systems in a head-to-head comparison with analog systems. However, when they applied specific protocols' reconstructions, the relative difference was minimized between analog and digital PET system (16).…”
Section: Variants Artifacts and Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is also the variability between observers as the measurement of this “most avid” pixel in a tumour volume is dependent on the size, shape and placement of the region of interest (ROI) 6 . In addition, these measurements are not transferable between machines, institutions or even necessarily repeatable from day to day on the same patient 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In addition, these measurements are not transferable between machines, institutions or even necessarily repeatable from day to day on the same patient. 7 Volumetric measurements of tumour activity for reporting are becoming more common in human medicine and are potentially more representative of the metabolic burden of a tumour. Some of the commonly reported parameters to date include the metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and the total lesion glycolysis (TLG).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%