2023
DOI: 10.21900/j.alise.2023.1376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Library and Information Science Educators Teaching Accessibility?

Kevin Mallary,
Rea Simons,
Clayton Copeland
et al.

Abstract: Library and information science (LIS) graduates are expected to serve patrons from diverse backgrounds, including disabled patrons. While serving patrons with disabilities is a core value of librarianship, graduates often feel unprepared to serve disabled patrons, suggesting that programs inadequately train students to design accessible services. This study’s authors analyzed hundreds of course descriptions and 73 syllabi from 20 North American LIS programs to determine how often accessibility and disability t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper analyzes syllabi collected from 20 North American LIS programs belonging to the Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE), American Library Association (ALA), and/or iSchools Consortium. This analysis builds on a previous study, where the full collection procedure and selection criteria for gathering syllabi are described (Mallary et al, 2023). While over 200 courses were initially identified as potentially addressing disability and/or accessibility, fewer than half of those courses had publicly‐available syllabi.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper analyzes syllabi collected from 20 North American LIS programs belonging to the Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE), American Library Association (ALA), and/or iSchools Consortium. This analysis builds on a previous study, where the full collection procedure and selection criteria for gathering syllabi are described (Mallary et al, 2023). While over 200 courses were initially identified as potentially addressing disability and/or accessibility, fewer than half of those courses had publicly‐available syllabi.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%