2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are low doses of tritium genotoxic to Mytilus edulis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Background levels of DNA damage in the controls were around 7±6 (MG) and 4±3 % (DP, % Tail DNA), relatable to previous findings [3,5,71,100], this suggests general good health of the unexposed (control) individuals. Interestingly, Cu genotoxicity was not significantly evident at the lowest concentrations (18 µg L -1 ), in either species.…”
Section: Cu Induced Genotoxicity In Gill Cellssupporting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Background levels of DNA damage in the controls were around 7±6 (MG) and 4±3 % (DP, % Tail DNA), relatable to previous findings [3,5,71,100], this suggests general good health of the unexposed (control) individuals. Interestingly, Cu genotoxicity was not significantly evident at the lowest concentrations (18 µg L -1 ), in either species.…”
Section: Cu Induced Genotoxicity In Gill Cellssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…It is well accepted that following uptake, waterborne contaminants are not uniformly distributed among the tissues due to their inherent metabolic capabilities [4,17,37,[71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Tissue-specific Cu Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed biological responses may be reflective of this form of radioactive phosphorus . Our study firstly suggests that gill and digestive gland tissues are sensitive and reliable cell types for assessing IR-induced damage, alongside haemocytes which are predominantly chosen as target cell types to study biological responses (Jha et al, 2005(Jha et al, , 2006Jaeschke et al, 2015;Dallas et al, 2016;. Secondly, our study has highlighted the necessity to evaluate response in several organs, as greater 32 P activity levels within digestive gland tissue in particular has induced a greater genotoxic response (Fig 2).…”
Section: Dosimetry and Dose-response Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…10 However, consensus on the RBE of tritium has not yet been reached. [15][16][17][18] The UK Advisory Group on Ionizing Radiation released a report suggesting that given the large number of radiobiology studies that focus on tritium, its RBE should be classified as a minimum of 2 and that 3 should be considered for safety. 19 Although the biological effects of high doses of tritium have been defined and genetic and specific tumor effects have been identified in animal models after long-term exposure, epidemiological investigations into the health risks associated with exposure to tritium are not yet publicly available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 However, consensus on the RBE of tritium has not yet been reached. 15 - 18 The UK Advisory Group on Ionizing Radiation released a report suggesting that given the large number of radiobiology studies that focus on tritium, its RBE should be classified as a minimum of 2 and that 3 should be considered for safety. 19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%