In this paper, we survey current evidence on cognitive precursors of reading in different orthographies by reviewing studies with a cross-linguistic research design. Graphic symbol knowledge, phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and rapid automatized naming were found to be associated with reading acquisition in all orthographies investigated. However, apart from rapid naming, this association is mostly interactive, meaning that young children develop their symbol knowledge, and phonological and morphological awareness during reading development. Especially for phonological awareness, crosslinguistic evidence involving phonologically transparent orthographies, both alphabetic and non-alphabetic, suggests that it may be less of a hurdle than in the complex English orthography. Cross-linguistic research designs can be a useful methodological approach to test limits of reading theories that were initially developed for alphabetic orthographies.Learning to read entails mapping the units of the writing system onto the corresponding spoken language units. In order to read a word or text, a child must be able to decode the graphic units of a particular orthography into spoken language units (e.g., morphemes, syllables, phonemes). During reading acquisition, children not only learn how written words are composed, but also build up orthographic representations of spoken language units (typically words or morphemes). Reading becomes fluent, when (1) decoding is automatized and (2) words can be directly and effortlessly retrieved from the orthographic lexicon (see also Verhoeven & Perfetti, 2021).By the time children commence formal reading instruction, they have typically already begun to acquire key knowledge and skills that will be associated with their subsequent success in learning. Cognitive precursors of reading are skills whose development starts prior to reading and which are functionally related to later reading skills . In order to decode words, children need to be familiar with the graphic symbols of the writing system (e.g., letters of an alphabet, Chinese characters). They should also become aware of the linguistic units represented by a particular orthography (phonological and morphological awareness). In addition, naming speed, that is the ability to name visual information quickly and effortlessly, is associated with (later) reading fluency. It is important to note that a precursor does not have to be fully established before the onset of reading acquisition. It is also possible that interacting with a writing system induces developmental steps that would not happen without this exposure. However, if these skills cannot be properly developed even in the context of reading exposure, reading difficulties are likely to appear in the long run.The precursors mentioned above can be assumed to play a role in any orthography. However, orthographies vary widely in how exactly they represent spoken language and, accordingly, crosslinguistic theories of reading development predict that the relevance of, an...