2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are NIR spectra useful for predicting site indices in sandy soils under Eucalyptus stands in Republic of Congo?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, results were found by Stenberg et al claiming that a high sand content reduces the accuracy of SOC estimation [39]. In contrast to previous studies, Bikindou et al reported the ability of soil reflectance spectroscopy to accurately determine SOC in sandy soils with low SOM concentrations [47].…”
Section: Multivariate Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Similarly, results were found by Stenberg et al claiming that a high sand content reduces the accuracy of SOC estimation [39]. In contrast to previous studies, Bikindou et al reported the ability of soil reflectance spectroscopy to accurately determine SOC in sandy soils with low SOM concentrations [47].…”
Section: Multivariate Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It has been largely used in several scientific areas such as remote sensing (e.g. Bikindou et al 2012), wood technology (e.g. Alves et al 2012), chemometrics (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marsden et al (2010) also found low correlations between the NDVI and the mean annual increment (MAI), where this correlation was progressively increasing throughout the plant size and establishment of the forest. Bikindou et al (2012) compared multiple regressions related to soil properties, and the NIR index was correlated with dominant height for productive capacity classification. According to these authors, the NIR provided a better correlation and a low mean square error for better predicting index variations in the studied area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%