Are Obesity and Physical Activity Clustered? A Spatial Analysis Linked to Residential Density

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine spatial clustering of obesity and/or moderate physical activity and their relationship to a neighborhood's built environment. Data on levels of obesity and moderate physical activity were derived from the results of a telephone survey conducted in 2006, with 1,863 survey respondents in the study sample. This sample was spread across eight suburban neighborhoods in Metro Vancouver. These areas were selected to contrast residential density and income and do not constitute a random sample, but within each area, respondents were selected randomly. Obesity and moderate physical activity were mapped to determine levels of global and local spatial autocorrelation within the neighborhoods. Clustering was measured using Moran's I at the global level, Anselin's Local Moran's I at the local level, and geographically weighted regression (GWR). The global‐level spatial analysis reveals no significant clustering for the attributes of obesity or moderate physical activity. Within individual neighborhoods, there is moderate clustering of obesity and/or physical activity but these clusters do not achieve statistical significance. In some neighborhoods, local clustering is restricted to a single pair of respondents with moderate physical activity. In other neighborhoods, any moderate local clustering is offset by negative local spatial autocorrelation. Importantly, there is no evidence of significant clustering for the attribute of obesity at either the global or local level of analysis. The GWR analysis fails to improve significantly upon the global model—thus reinforcing the negative results. Overall, the study indicates that the relationship between the urban environment and obesity is not direct.

Worldwide spatial genetic structure of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene: a new evolutionary ecological evidence for the thrifty genotype hypothesis

“…Unlike conventional OLS regression, which may only produce a single regression equation to summarize global relationships between D allele and synthetic climate factors, GWR used in this paper can generate spatial dependence that express the local spatial variation between them dynamically, because the regression coefficients of GWR are allowed to vary spatially. As a powerful spatial statistical method to examine geographical variation between dependent and independent variables, GWR has been successfully used in spatial epidemiology 35 and similarly in spatial ecology. 36 Figure 2 shows the geographic genetic clines interpolated by D allele frequency of ACE gene and the route of out-of-Africa expansion by GIS superimposition analysis.…”

Distribution characteristics of unmanaged cat colonies over a 20 year period in Auckland, New Zealand

“…Groupings of positive I values with significant z-scores showed evidence of clustering while groupings of negative spatial autocorrelation indices provides an argument for a lack of clustering. A minimum of six significant positive indices in close proximity were used as evidence of clustering, similar to the work of Schuurman, Peters, and Oliver (2009). To further characterize results of Anselin's Local Moran's I, areas with statistically significant indices (p-value < 0.05) are classified using local and global mean cat colony densities (local mean refers to the average cat colony density using the area's neighbourhood): HH for areas with local means higher than the global mean; LL for areas with local means lower than the global mean; HL for areas with values higher than the local mean and; LH for areas with values lower than the local mean.…”

Stray cats in Auckland, New Zealand: Discovering geographic information for exploratory spatial analysis

“…Groupings of positive I values with significant z-scores in close proximity provide evidence of clustering while groupings of negative spatial autocorrelation indices provides an argument for a lack of clustering. This work follows a minimum of six significant positive indices in close proximity as evidence of clustering, similar to the work of Schuurman, Peters, and Oliver (2009). For a convenient visualization or clustering using Anselin's Local Moran's I, areas with statistically significant (0.05) indices are classified using the local and global means (local mean is the average stray cat density using the area's neighbourhood while the global mean is the overall average).…”