Are Organizational Interventions Effective in Protecting Healthcare Worker Mental Health during Epidemics/Pandemics? A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

It is unclear how to effectively protect healthcare workers’ mental health during infectious disease epidemics. Targeting the occupational determinants of stress may hold more promise than individual stress management, which has received more focus. Through a systematic review of the 2000–2021 English- and French-language scientific literature, we evaluated the effectiveness of organizational and psychosocial work environment interventions to protect healthcare workers’ mental health in an epidemic/pandemic context. Evidence from medium- and high-quality studies was synthesized using GRADE. Among 1604 unique search results, 41 studies were deemed relevant, yielding 34 low-quality and seven medium-quality studies. The latter reported on promising multi-component prevention programs that combined staffing adjustments, work shift arrangements, enhanced infection prevention and control, recognition of workers’ efforts, psychological and/or logistic support during lockdowns (e.g., accommodation). Our confidence in the effectiveness of reviewed interventions is low to very low, however, owing to methodological limitations. We highlight gaps in the reporting of intervention process and context elements and discuss theory and implementation failure as possible explanations for results. We conclude by urging authors of future studies to include and document detailed risk assessments of the work environment, involve workers in solution design and implementation and consider how this process can be adapted during an emergency.

Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Hospital Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Hospital-Based Repeated Measures Study

“…Therefore, whether the increased cardiovascular risk was caused by burnout due to the pandemic remains unclear in the present study. Ensuring that interventions are theoretically designed to address the occupational determinants of stress and that workers are involved in change processes should increase the likelihood of better health outcomes for HCWs during emergencies [ 24 ]. A follow-up and moderated approach are needed to establish the cause–effect relationships between the event, behavior, and health outcomes.…”

Protecting Frontline Nurses: What will it take? A review of policy, practice and lessons learned from High Consequence Infectious Diseases like Ebola and COVID-19

“…The duration of interventions also varied widely. 21 In another systematic review that extended from 2003 to 2020 and included patients, health workers, and the general public, the researchers found that the prevalence of probable depressive disorder and PTSD in healthcare workers after the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak was 12 and 11%, respectively. 22 In another rapid systematic review researchers explored what health workforce factors were associated with psychological distress in the context of working during an infectious disease outbreak.…”

Psychosocial Risks among Quebec Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Social Media Analysis

“…This project integrated three complementary approaches to gathering knowledge. It included a systematic literature review evaluating the effectiveness of interventions targeting work organization or the psychosocial work environment to protect HCWs' mental health during epidemics [45,46]. It also included an online survey about organizational measures implemented in healthcare establishments to mitigate psychosocial work exposure during the pandemic, as reported by human resources staff.…”