Are Physicians Ready for Patients With Internet-Based Health Information?

Abstract

BackgroundAn increasing number of patients bring Internet-based health information to medical consultations. However, little is known about how physicians experience, manage, and view these patients.Objective This study aimed to advance the understanding of the effects of incorporating Internet-based health information into routine medical consultations from physicians’ perspectives, using a qualitative approach.MethodsSix focus groups were conducted with 48 family physicians practising in Toronto. The data were analyzed using qualitative methods of content analysis and constant comparison, derived from grounded theory approach.ResultsThree overarching themes were identified: (1) perceived reactions of patients, (2) physician burden, and (3) physician interpretation and contextualization of information. Physicians in our study generally perceived Internet-based health information as problematic when introduced by patients during medical consultations. They believed that Internet information often generated patient misinformation, leading to confusion, distress, or an inclination towards detrimental self-diagnosis and/or self-treatment. Physicians felt these influences added a new interpretive role to their clinical responsibilities. Although most of the physicians felt obliged to carry out this new responsibility, the additional role was often unwelcome. Despite identifying various reactions of patients to Internet-based health information, physicians in our study were unprepared to handle these patients.ConclusionEffective initiatives at the level of the health care system are needed. The potential of Internet-based health information to lead to better physician-patient communication and patient outcomes could be facilitated by promoting physician acknowledgment of increasing use of the Internet among patients and by developing patient management guidelines and incentives for physicians.

US Approaches to Physician Payment: The Deconstruction of Primary Care

“…21 Recent analyses have suggested that for a typical panel of patients, primary care physicians are now woefully short of time to even discuss basic preventive services, much less address chronic illness care. 22,23 FFS payment for primary care encounters requires substantial recalibration to support the time needed by primary care physicians to meet these expectations.…”

‘A heartbeat moment’: qualitative study of GP views of patients bringing health information from the internet to a consultation

“…13 There are relatively few qualitative or quantitative data on this subject, and those that do exist do not support this apocalyptic view. Moreover, although some physicians report generally negative attitudes toward introducing health information from the internet into consultations, 14 others are more positive. 15 The proportion of patients who use the internet to find health information is increasing; 16 however, the proportion who bring this information to a consultation remains relatively low.…”

Consumer health information services in public libraries in Canada and the US

“…Despite the patientperceived benefits of bringing Internet health information into medical consultations, family physicians in a study at St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto believed that Internet information generated patient misinformation, leading to con-fusion, distress, or an inclination towards detrimental selfdiagnosis and/or self-treatment [10]. CHI librarians have responded to this problem by providing guidance (often oneon-one or group training sessions) to assist consumers in locating reliable health information and developing critical skills in evaluating the health information resources that they find on the Internet.…”